Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Thomas W. Faircloth, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Thomas Faircloth's appointed counsel, Jonathan Dodson, to withdraw from representing Faircloth in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed with Dodson's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed both Faircloth's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-05-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-14899

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Thomas Faircloth's appointed counsel, Jonathan Dodson, to withdraw from representing Faircloth in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed with Dodson's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed both Faircloth's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Thomas W. Faircloth, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Thomas Faircloth's appointed counsel, Jonathan Dodson, to withdraw from representing Faircloth in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed with Dodson's assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed both Faircloth's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-14899

    Date Filed: 05/12/2016

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-14899
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00013-WLS-TQL-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    THOMAS W. FAIRCLOTH,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (May 12, 2016)
    Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Thomas Faircloth in this direct
    criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the

    Case: 14-14899

    Date Filed: 05/12/2016

    Page: 2 of 2

    appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,
    87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
    record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
    correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
    issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Faircloths
    conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like