Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Daniel Webster v. Fulton County, Georgia, 218 F.3d 1267, 11th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court in a case regarding Fulton County, Georgia. The appellate court adopted the opinion and reasoning of the district court, which was published at 51 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (N.D. Ga. 1999). The appellate court declined to address one of the appellant's arguments, finding it was raised for the first time on appeal and not presented to the district court originally.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-07-19 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 218 F.3d 1267 Docket: 99-12216

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court in a case regarding Fulton County, Georgia. The appellate court adopted the opinion and reasoning of the district court, which was published at 51 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (N.D. Ga. 1999). The appellate court declined to address one of the appellant's arguments, finding it was raised for the first time on appeal and not presented to the district court originally.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views1 page

    Daniel Webster v. Fulton County, Georgia, 218 F.3d 1267, 11th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court in a case regarding Fulton County, Georgia. The appellate court adopted the opinion and reasoning of the district court, which was published at 51 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (N.D. Ga. 1999). The appellate court declined to address one of the appellant's arguments, finding it was raised for the first time on appeal and not presented to the district court originally.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    218 F.3d 1267 (11th Cir.

    2000)

    DANIEL WEBSTER and PEGGY WEBSTER, et al.,


    Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants,
    WEBSTER GREEN THUMB COMPANY, and others
    similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
    v.
    FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, Defendant-Appellant, CrossAppellee,
    MIKE KENN; MICHAEL HIGHTOWER, et al., DefendantsCross-Appellees.
    No. 99-12216

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    July 19, 2000

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of
    Georgia D. C. Docket No. 96-02399-CV-TWT-1
    Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, DUBINA and HILL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the
    district court published at 51 F.Supp.2d 1354 (N.D. Ga. 1999).
    AFFIRMED.1

    NOTES:
    1

    We decline to address appellants' challenge to the scope of the injunction. The


    argument was not presented to the district court; rather, it was raised for the
    first time on appeal.

    You might also like