Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PLATE Vs Surface
PLATE Vs Surface
PLATE Vs Surface
STAAD Pro
To give you an analogy, think of the surface as a chess board, and the plate
element as the individual squares in that board. You can define the chess board
as 64 elements (option a) or 1 surface (option b).
Your question:
1. Is there any INACTIVE or IGNORE STIFFNESS facility for SURFACE
ELEMENT like the one for member and Plate element?
Answer: No.
------------------------------------------Your question:
2. In modelling a R.C.C shear wall structure is it necessary to model
SHEAR WALL with SURFACE ELEMENT? Why not modelled it with
either PLATE ELEMENT or MEMBER i.e. COLUMN member?
Answer:
In STAAD, a shear wall has to be modelled using Surface Element(s) if and only if
you intend to perform an RC design on that shear wall. If it is modelled using a
mesh of plate elements, the program would have had to reconstruct a physical
wall from those elements during the RC design phase, and obtain the forces and
moments at certain specific sections along the height of the wall. This is quite a
tedious process and fraught with errors. When the shear wall is modelled as a
surface entity, it has a better understanding of the elements that constitute the
wall since the meshing is done internally during the analysis process, and thus,
gathering the required results for wall design becomes easier.
However, if an RC design of the shear wall is not needed, you can model it using
elements, as demonstrated in example 9 in the Application examples section of
the program documentation.
Though some people model a wall as a column member, it is not recommended
since a wall being a 2-dimensional entity has Poisson effect, which means a load,
applied along one direction causes it to deform along a perpendicular direction. I
don't know how this effect can be captured if it is modelled as a member.