Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Transpo1 PAL Vs CA

    Uploaded by

    Ana Rogers
    9 views1 page
    A passenger filed a complaint against Philippine Airlines for damages after he missed his connecting flight. The passenger alleged that he arrived at the airport on time for his first flight from Manila to Cebu, but his flight was delayed. This caused him to miss his connecting flight from Cebu to another destination. While Philippine Airlines assisted the passenger in rescheduling his connecting flight for the next day, he argued he suffered damages from the missed connection. The Supreme Court had to determine the duration of an airline's responsibility to passengers and whether the airline could be held liable for damages caused by a delayed first flight resulting in a missed connection.

    Original Description:

    transpo case

    Original Title

    Transpo1 PAL vs CA

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    A passenger filed a complaint against Philippine Airlines for damages after he missed his connecting flight. The passenger alleged that he arrived at the airport on time for his first flight from Manila to Cebu, but his flight was delayed. This caused him to miss his connecting flight from Cebu to another destination. While Philippine Airlines assisted the passenger in rescheduling his connecting flight for the next day, he argued he suffered damages from the missed connection. The Supreme Court had to determine the duration of an airline's responsibility to passengers and whether the airline could be held liable for damages caused by a delayed first flight resulting in a missed connection.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    9 views1 page

    Transpo1 PAL Vs CA

    Uploaded by

    Ana Rogers
    A passenger filed a complaint against Philippine Airlines for damages after he missed his connecting flight. The passenger alleged that he arrived at the airport on time for his first flight from Manila to Cebu, but his flight was delayed. This caused him to miss his connecting flight from Cebu to another destination. While Philippine Airlines assisted the passenger in rescheduling his connecting flight for the next day, he argued he suffered damages from the missed connection. The Supreme Court had to determine the duration of an airline's responsibility to passengers and whether the airline could be held liable for damages caused by a delayed first flight resulting in a missed connection.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Topic: II.Common Carrier; C.

    Common Carriage of Passengers;


    2.Duration of Responsibility
    PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., petitioner,
    vs.
    COURT OF APPEALS and PEDRO ZAPATOS, respondents.

    GR No L-82619September 15, 1993 First Division

    BELLOSILLO, J.:
    Brief FACTS:
    Respondent PEDRO ZAPATOS filed a COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR
    BREACH OF CONTRACT against PAL.
    He alleged the following (I will present the events in table form, I think the
    facts particularly the events and corresponding actions/steps of PAL and
    passenger Zapatos are very important in this case):

    You might also like