Professional Documents
Culture Documents
tmp1043 TMP
tmp1043 TMP
Song et a].
(54)
US 8,673,048 B2
5,803,947 A
6,355,085 B1
2009/0285716 A1
2010/0101957 A1*
4/2010
2010/0228056 A1
1354267 A
6/2002
CN
101285131 B
6/2010
( ) Nonce'
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
_
* cited by examiner
(22)
Filed:
Dec 12 2011
(65)
US 2013/0145899 A1
(51) Int- Cl
(57)
C22B 21/00
B22D 27/02
B 03C 1/02
(52) US. C1.
(58)
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
(2006.01)
ABSTRACT
References Cited
(56)
3/ 1984 McMonigle
9/ 1985 MaWardi
12K /
26/
32
US. Patent
Sheet 2 of2
US 8,673,048 B2
/,
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
48
1
M
24
m3
455a.
22
US 8,673,048 B2
1
TECHNICAL FIELD
melt.
35
50
from the melt or vice versa. Either portion of the melt can be
removed therefrom by a variety of methods as Will undoubt
edly be knoWn in the art. For example, if the melt is held
Within a crucible fumace, a portion of the melt may be
55
alloys.
60
US 8,673,048 B2
3
may distort the magnetic ?eld, such as, for example if the
vessel is made of iron. In the ?rst case, the magnetic ?eld
generator may lie close to, but outside of, the vessel and melt.
In the second case, the magnetic ?eld generator may be
located Within the vessel and possibly in direct contact With
the melt so that the vessel Will not interfere With the separa
tion or removal processes.
the melt so that the atmosphere above the melt can be pres
suriZed and the iron-depleted nonferrous metal can be
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED
EMBODIMENTS
30
magnesium, copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), tin (Sn), silver (Ag), and
gold (Au) are all nonferrous metals that may be puri?ed
according to embodiments disclosed herein.
45
speci?cation.
metal casing With outer Walls 18 and a bottom 20. The bottom
20 of the metal casing is suitably lined With ?rebrick or other
refractory material 22 and the outer Walls 18 are suitably lined
netic ?eld line diagram has been draWn outWardly from the
magnetic ?eld generator to symbolically illustrate the gradi
55
65
US 8,673,048 B2
5
Within the melt 34. Magnetic ?eld lines 42 are shoWn With
art.
20
35
40
45
50
55
60
about 600-750 C.
Once the iron is present Within the melt 34 as a distinct
Within the melt near the magnetic ?eld generator 40, as shoWn
in FIGS. 3 and 4. The remaining portion of the melt 34 Will
thus comprise a nonferrous metal or alloy that has been
depleted of iron, or re?ned. This region may be referred to
herein as an iron-depleted region.
This method of magnetic separation can be used to effec
65
US 8,673,048 B2
8
7
The re?ned nonferrous metal or alloy can then be separated
20
35
40
45
50
60
65
US 8,673,048 B2
9
10
model:
106 A/m.
ably large ?eld of H:l000 A/m. And, even above the Curie
20
not moving.
When a material is placed in a magnetic ?eld some of the
(3)
35
(4)
LaW:
45
50
Field Gradient
The net effect of the magnetic ?eld gradient on a ferromag
55
(6)
Where 1] is the ?uid viscosity, r is the Stokes radius of the
(7)
60
US 8,673,048 B2
11
12
7. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
applying the magnetic ?eld gradient to the melt and main
5
(10)
depth; and
055
gravity.
20
35
depleted region.
2. The method of claim 1 Wherein the magnetic ?eld gra
dient is applied to the melt by placing at least one of a
permanent magnet and an electromagnet near the melt.
3. The method of claim 1 Wherein the distinct liquid or solid
containing particles.
50