Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Harold Eugene Young, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding defendant Harold Young's appeal of his conviction and sentence. Young's appointed counsel, Gwendolyn Spivey, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the panel of three circuit judges granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed Young's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-10-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-10939

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding defendant Harold Young's appeal of his conviction and sentence. Young's appointed counsel, Gwendolyn Spivey, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the panel of three circuit judges granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed Young's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Harold Eugene Young, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding defendant Harold Young's appeal of his conviction and sentence. Young's appointed counsel, Gwendolyn Spivey, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the panel of three circuit judges granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed Young's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-10939

    Date Filed: 10/07/2014

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-10939
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00021-MW-GRJ-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    HAROLD EUGENE YOUNG,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (October 7, 2014)
    Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-10939

    Date Filed: 10/07/2014

    Page: 2 of 2

    Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Harold Young, has filed a motion
    to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
    Youngs conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like