Why Canada's Top Court Should Weigh in On Electoral Reform

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Enter a term, stock symbol or company name

Home

News

Editorials

Opinion

Business

Letters to the Editor

Investing

Columnists

Sports

Life

Arts

Search

Tech

Drive

Become a
Member

Login

Subscribe

Real Estate

Help

AdChoices

The Munk Debates

Home Opinion

BENJAMIN PERRIN

Why Canadas top court should weigh


in on electoral reform
BENJAMIN PERRIN
Contributed to The Globe and Mail
Published Friday, Jul. 22, 2016 6:00AM EDT
Last updated Thursday, Jul. 21, 2016 5:54PM EDT

AA

Comments

Benjamin Perrin is a law professor at the University of British Columbia and


a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute for Public Policy.
---------------------------------------

THE GLOBE RECOMMENDS


Lexpert: Perceived conflict won't protect
minority shareholders

has been at the core of Canadian democracy since Confederation. No

France wants to feel safe whatever it

matter which model it ends up proposing, significant changes to how


MPs are selected and, accordingly, how our federal government is

takes. But what if it takes too much?

formed must be referred to the Supreme Court of Canada and a

Democrats woo Republicans who are wary of x

referendum should be held.

Trump

Any major electoral reform proposal should first be referred to the top
court to guarantee that it is within the exclusive jurisdiction of

Why Erdogan should take a lesson from


India

Mrs. Satan or Joan of Arc: The story of

The House of Commons special committee on electoral reform has


started hearings into alternatives to the first-past-the-post system that

Parliament to adopt. Only this will ensure the legality of proposed


changes.

Victoria Woodhull
When the former Conservative government wanted to reform how
senators were selected, the Liberals were adamant that the court be
consulted. In the 2014 reference case, the court ruled that consultative

MOST POPULAR VIDEOS

elections for senators triggered the general amending procedure in the


Constitution, requiring approval of at least seven provinces representing
at least 50 per cent of the population. This scuttled the governments
attempt to unilaterally adopt legislation to that effect.
In a reference decision on electoral reform, the court would determine
whether Parliament has the authority to change the rules by which MPs
are chosen or whether provincial approval is required, and to what
extent. There is some uncertainty as to whether Parliament has such
power acting alone, which may vary depending on the electoral model
chosen.

NEWS

NEWS

'I will gladly lend you


my copy': Father of
fallen Muslim soldier
offers Trump his
Constitution

'No Donald, you don't':


Watch the highlights
from Hillary Clinton's
convention speech

Imagine that Parliament were to adopt major electoral reform without


consulting the court and an election were held under the new rules,
resulting in a newly composed Parliament and government. If a
constitutional challenge were then brought that found Parliament lacked
the authority to change these rules on its own, it would create a
constitutional crisis that could invalidate all of the laws and actions
taken by such a government. Why would we risk such a disaster?
If ever there were a case for prudence, this is it. With clear questions,
the court can provide clear answers on proposed electoral reform before

NEWS

it is adopted. The court has shown it can act expeditiously in such

matters. The sooner a reference is made, the sooner we will receive a


response.

HIGHLIGHTS
While a court reference on electoral reform would ensure legal
legitimacy, it does not provide political legitimacy. Changing the rules by
which MPs are chosen is an extraordinary change to the foundation of

NEWS

Chelsea Clinton on her


mother - 'my role
model' - and
Triceratops

Warning graphic
content: Toronto
officer's trial sees
video of Sammy Yatim
shooting

our democratic system. It is not ordinary legislation. Nor did Prime


Minister Justin Trudeau run on a specific electoral reform proposal,
although he has expressed favour for one model that analysts say
would benefit his party.
A referendum is the only way to ensure political legitimacy of any reform
proposal. Canadians were rightly given a voice on major constitutional
reform in 1992, rejecting the Charlottetown accord. It is beyond ironic
that a project professing to enhance our democracy could be advanced
unilaterally by a majority government elected with less than 50 per cent
of the popular vote.

REPORT ON BUSINESS

REPORT ON BUSINESS

Newly minted British


PM Theresa May takes
aim at corporate
governance, proposes
reform

Employer's dilemma:
new workplace, no
public transit

MORE FROM THE GLOBE AND MAIL

Holding a referendum on electoral reform would allow Canadians to say


whether they want to change the system or not, and, if so, which model
they prefer. Failing to do so would indelibly stain the Liberal government
as opportunist for using its majority to entrench new rules that favour
the partys electoral outcomes for decades to come. The cynicism that
would be bred by such a move would be palpable hardly sunny
ways.
Informal community dialogue events and consulting Canadians on

REPORT ON BUSINESS

Brazils
Olympic party will be
a brief respite from
economic misery

LIFE

Want to prevent
boredom this
summer? First, you
need to understand it

social media are incredibly poor substitutes for a referendum conducted


using a secret ballot, supervised and run by Elections Canada. The
broad support that is required for major electoral reform can only be
accurately and objectively gauged by a referendum. Theres no
reasonable excuse for the Liberal government not to make it happen.
No matter which model of electing our MPs and forming our government
is preferred, we need to get it right. Only a Supreme Court reference
and subsequent national referendum will ensure that electoral reform
has both the legal and political legitimacy that Canadians deserve for
such a major change.
!

Report Typo/Error

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY


You wanna be consulted on electoral reform?
Go consult yourself
Federal minister withholds support for referendum on electoral
GLOBE EDITORIAL

MOST POPULAR
1 . Judge says RCMP manufactured B.C. terror

plot, overturns guilty verdict

reform
CAPPE AND STEIN

Government by referendums is not democracy

2 . U.S. has crossed red line, declared war,

says North Korea

Become a Globe Member and get access to

3 . Hillary (mostly) hits her marks


4 . My child with Down syndrome faces the

The Globes House Price Data Centre

extinction of her kind and thats breaking

Tools to track your portfolio

my heart

Newsletters
And more exclusive content

Sign up for FREE today

5 . July 29: Your daily horoscope

Comments

AA

MORE TOP STORIES

MARKET UPDATES

The close: TSX finishes


higher, fails to avoid
weekly decline

VIDEO

EDITORIALS

One murky word

OLYMPICS

Russian weightlifters
banned from Rio
Olympics for doping

TELEVISION & MEDIA

Late-night television
hosts get political for
ratings

STARTUPS

How two brothers


revived their family's
Tennessee whiskey
distillery

PHOTOS

INVESTMENT IDEAS

Berkeley study finds


scarce evidence of
market front-running

He-said-she-said:
Contrasting Trump
and Clinton's
convention speeches

Eye-candy experience
at NY ice cream
museum

See inside Tesla's new


giant factory

Canadian GDP reliant


on real estate

Photos of the Day for


July 28

Images from closing


day at the Democratic
National Convention

connect with us

Products
The Globe and Mail Newspaper
Newspaper delivered to your doorstep.
Subscribe to the newspaper

Globe Unlimited
Digital all access pass across devices.
Subscribe to Globe Unlimited

Globe2Go
The digital replica of our newspaper.
Subscribe to Globe2Go

Advertise with us

Our Company

GlobeLink.ca Your number one partner for


reaching Canada's Influential Achievers.

About us
Work at The Globe
Staff

Get top Globe stories sent to your inbox.


Subscribe to email newsletters

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Secure Services
Secure Drop
Staff PGP Directory

Customer Service

Globe Unlimited digital edition and Globe2Go epaper group discounts available. Learn more

Contact Us
Customer Preference Center
FAQs
Customer Care website
Digital subscription services
Print subscription services
Change your delivery address
Vacation Stops

Corporate financial data and content licensing


for your organization. Learn more

Globe Recognition Special Globe


events and offers for subscribers

The Globe at your Workplace

Globe eBooks
A collection of articles by the Globe.
View the library

News

Other Sections
Or go directly to:
Newspaper
Magazine
Digital
Globe Alliance: extend your reach
Globe Edge: custom content
Classifieds

Globe Corporate Sales


Globe Email Newsletters

Mobile Apps

Appointments
Art Store
Births & Announcements
Corrections
Classifieds
Classroom Edition
Deaths
Newspaper Ads
Real Estate
Special Reports
Site Map

Or go directly to:
Report On Business Top 1000
DataStore essential business intelligence

Disclaimer

Accessibility Policy

Community Guidelines

Globe sustainability

Copyright 2016 The Globe and Mail Inc. All Rights Reserved.
444 Front St. W., Toronto, ON Canada M5V 2S9
Phillip Crawley, Publisher

Editorial Code of Conduct

You might also like