Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil With Sand and Cement As A Subgrade Pavement
Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil With Sand and Cement As A Subgrade Pavement
Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil With Sand and Cement As A Subgrade Pavement
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 341
editor@iaeme.com
1. INTRODUCTION
Soil is defined as sediments or other accumulation of mineral particles produced by
the physical (or) chemical disintegration of rocks plus the air, water, organic matter
and other substances that may be included. Soil is typically a non homogenous,
porous, earthen material whose engineering behavior is influenced by changes on
moisture content and density. Based on the origin, soil can be broadly classified as
organic and inorganic. Organic soils are mixture derived from growth and decay of
plant life and also accumulation of skeleton or shell of small organism. Inorganic soils
are derived from the mechanical (or) chemical weathering of rocks. Inorganic soil that
is still located at the place where it was formed is referred to residual soil. If the soil
has been moved to another location by gravity, water or wind, it is referred as
transported soil. Soil may remain at the place of its origin (or) it may be transported
by various natural agencies. It is said to be 'residual' in the earlier situation and
'transported' in the latter.
The clumping of the soil textural components of sand, silt and clay forms
aggregates and the further association of those aggregates into larger units forms soil
structure called peds.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Mrs. Neetu B.ramteke, Prof. Anilkumar saxena, Prof . T.R.Arora (2014) (9) did
theirwork on the stabilization of black cotton soil with sand and cement as sub grade
for pavement thus stabilization with cement is fairly independent of soil properties.
The improvement of strength and compressibility characteristics of soil. The soil is
then stabilized with sand and cement. The amount of sand for stabilization is taken in
the proportion of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% by dry weight of soil and the amount of
cement was taken as 2% by dry weight of soil. Using these proportions, mix samples
were prepared as given below and a set of laboratory tests were performed to
determine the index properties and CBR values of both natural soil and mixed
proportion samples.
Conducting sieve analysis test the soil is classified as: By AASHTO Classification
Chart, it lies under the range of A-7 group, A- 7-5 subgroup. And by Unified soil
classification system (USCS) and IS Classification system the soil is classified as MH
(Silt of High Compressibility). The Atterberg limits are a basic measure of the nature
of fine grained soil. Depending upon the water content of the soil, it may appear in
four states namely Soild, Semi solid, Plastic, Liquid. In each state the consistency and
behavior of the soil is different and thus so are its engineering properties. Thus, the
boundary between each state can be defined based on a change in the soils behavior.
To assess the amount of compaction and the water content required in the field,
compaction tests are done on the soil samples in the laboratory.. The study reveals
that the CBR value increases with the increase in sand content and reaches to a
desirable CBR value for sub grade of pavement. Normally soaked CBR value is
considered for pavement design. Experimentally it is found that the addition of sand
content in the soil results in the improvement of soaked CBR value from 1.93% to
7.39%. The maximum CBR is obtained while using 40% sand and 2% cement with
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 342
editor@iaeme.com
Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil with Sand and Cement as A Subgrade Pavement
the natural soil. Atterberg limits i.e. Liquid limit, plastic limit, plasticity index and
free swelling index goes on decreasing with the increase in sand content, whereas
moisture content goes on decreasing and maximum dry density increases with
increasing sand content. The black cotton soil after stabilizing with sand and cement
for higher MDD & CBR.
4.3. Methodology
In this work, the black cotton soil is stabilized with sand and cement, black cotton soil
is extracted from chintakommadinne area and different engineering and index
properties were studied to suggest the optimum percentage of sand and cement to
stabilize the expansive soil. Sand is added 10 % and cement is added 2 % up to 30 %
to the expansive soil at 10 % intervals.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 343
editor@iaeme.com
Specific gravity
Free swell index
Liquid limit
Plastic limit
Shrinkage limit
Standard proctor test
Unconfined compression test
5. REMEDIAL MEASURES
The following section presents the some of the remedial measures for strengthening
the weak soils.
5.1. Stabilization
Stabilization aims at improving soil strength and increasing resistance to softening by
water through bonding the soil particles together water proofing the particles. Usually,
the technology provides an alternative provision structural solution to a practical
problem. The simplest stabilization processes are compaction and drainage (if water
drains out of wet soil it becomes stronger). The other process is by improving
gradation of particle size and further improvement can be achieved by adding binders
to the weak soils. All these methods fall into two broad categories:
Mechanical stabilization
Chemical stabilization
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 344
editor@iaeme.com
Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil with Sand and Cement as A Subgrade Pavement
Cement
Lime
Fly ash
Blast furnace slag
DESCRIPTION
Weight of density bottle W1 in gms
Weight of density bottle+ dry soil W2 in gms
Weight of density bottle+ soil+ water W3 in gms
Weight of density bottle+ water W4 in gms
Temperature of water T in c
Specific gravity of soil solids G
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 345
1
22.5
42.5
87
75.5
29
2.35
2
22.5
42.5
88.5
76.5
29
2.5
editor@iaeme.com
RESULT
The average specific gravity of soil particles for density bottle method is 2.42
Table 2 STANDARD PROCTOR TEST (0%)
SL.NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DESCRIPTION
Weight of mould
Weight of mould +wet soil
Weight of wet soil
Container no
Weight of container
Weight o container + wet soil
Weight of container + dry soil
Weight of water
Weight of dry soil
Water content
Wet density
Dry density
1
2271
4150
1879
135
29.9
119.85
111.25
8.6
81.35
10.57
1.88
1.70
2
2271
4349.5
2078.5
38
36.05
126.3
117.4
8.83
81.42
10.84
2.08
1.87
3
2271
4446
2175
101
29.67
144.12
132
12.12
102.33
11.84
2.18
1.94
4
2271
4370
2099
416
36.6
177.5
160.81
16.69
124.21
13.43
2.10
1.85
SPT (0%)
1.85
DRY DENSITY(d)g/cc
1.8
1.75
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
0
10
15
20
25
30
RESULT
Optimum moisture content (OMC) = 11.8 %
Maximum dry density
(MDD) = 1.94 g/cc
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 346
editor@iaeme.com
Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil with Sand and Cement as A Subgrade Pavement
Table 3 CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST (0%)
S.
No
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Penetration dial
reading
0
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
Penetration in
mm
0
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
Load in
kg
0
263.16
370.76
461.99
538.02
602.34
660.82
719.30
778.95
836.26
886.55
929.83
964.92
1005.85
1049.13
CBR(0%)
1200
PENETRATION (mm)
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0
LOAD IN kg
RESULT
CBR of the given sample = 38.92mm
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 347
editor@iaeme.com
DESCRIPTION
Container no
Weight of container
No .of blows
Weight of container + wet soil
Weight of container + dry soil
Weight of water
Weight of dry soil
Water content
1
53
30.5
14
36.5
34.5
2
4
50
2
58
32.5
28
39
37
2
4.5
44.44
3
514
33.0
39
41
38.5
2.5
5.5
39.6
4
517
31.5
53
39
37
2
5.5
36.36
Chart Title
Water content (%)
60
50
40
30
20
Series1
10
0
1
10
100
1000
no of blows
RESULT
Liquid limit of soil (LL) = 43%
COMPARISON GRAPHS
Chart Title
60
water content
50
40
LL - 10%
30
LL - 20%
20
LL - 30%
10
0
1
10
100
no of blows
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 348
editor@iaeme.com
Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil with Sand and Cement as A Subgrade Pavement
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
10%
1
0.8
20%
0.6
30%
0.4
0.2
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
4.5
4
STRESS (kg/cm2)
3.5
3
2.5
UCC - 10%
2
UCC - 20%
1.5
UCC - 30%
1
0.5
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
STRAIN
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 349
editor@iaeme.com
350
300
LOAD(KG)
250
200
CBR 10%
150
CBR - 20%
100
CBR - 30%
50
0
0
10
PENETRATION(MM)
8. CONCLUSIONS
Black cotton soils were tested with sand and cement to ascertain the benefits of
stabilization. Minimum quantity of cement i.e., 2% and sand i.e., 10% was added to
target soils from 10% to 30% at 10% intervals. The tests conducted were: mechanical
properties, Atterberg limits, Proctor compaction, UCC and CBR.
The following trends are observed from the results of the experimental investigation:
Specific Gravity: of the stabilized soil increased, in general, with increase in fly ash
content. Decrease must be takes place.
Liquid Limit: of stabilized soil definitely decreased with increase in sand and cement.
However, there should be increase or decrease is marginal when increase in sand and
cement in black cotton soils.
Plastic Limit: of the stabilized soil decreased with increase in sand and cement
content. However, the percentage decrease in plastic limit, at 20% sand and cement,
is not related directly to the initial plastic limit of the soils.
Proctor Density: There is a decrease in OMC and increase in MDD when addition of
sand and cement for about 30%.
Unconfined compressive strength: However, there is an gradual increase in 20% for
unconfined compressive strength and decrease in 30%. There is an decrease in shear
strength in 20% and increase in 30%.
California Bearing Ratio: There is an decrease of CBR value for 20% and increase
value for 30%
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 350
editor@iaeme.com
Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil with Sand and Cement as A Subgrade Pavement
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 351
editor@iaeme.com