Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Rogelio Ramirez-Solorio, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of James Howard, the appointed counsel for Rogelio Ramirez-Solorio, to withdraw from the case. The counsel had filed an Anders brief indicating there were no arguable issues with merit to appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the three-judge panel of the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and affirmed both Ramirez-Solorio's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-13946

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of James Howard, the appointed counsel for Rogelio Ramirez-Solorio, to withdraw from the case. The counsel had filed an Anders brief indicating there were no arguable issues with merit to appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the three-judge panel of the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and affirmed both Ramirez-Solorio's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Rogelio Ramirez-Solorio, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of James Howard, the appointed counsel for Rogelio Ramirez-Solorio, to withdraw from the case. The counsel had filed an Anders brief indicating there were no arguable issues with merit to appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the three-judge panel of the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit and affirmed both Ramirez-Solorio's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 13-13946

    Date Filed: 11/25/2014

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 13-13946
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00264-AT-JFK-3

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    ROGELIO RAMIREZ-SOLORIO,
    a.k.a. Rojo,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (November 25, 2014)
    Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 13-13946

    Date Filed: 11/25/2014

    Page: 2 of 2

    James Howard, appointed counsel for Rogelio Ramirez-Solorio, has filed a


    motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
    Ramirez-Solorios conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like