Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Norman v. Charlton, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Robert Godfrey, the appointed counsel for Norman Charlton regarding his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit. After independently reviewing the entire record, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit agrees there are no issues of merit and affirms both Charlton's convictions and sentences. The motion to withdraw as counsel is granted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-03-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-12805

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Godfrey, the appointed counsel for Norman Charlton regarding his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit. After independently reviewing the entire record, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit agrees there are no issues of merit and affirms both Charlton's convictions and sentences. The motion to withdraw as counsel is granted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Norman v. Charlton, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Godfrey, the appointed counsel for Norman Charlton regarding his direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed an Anders brief stating there are no arguable issues of merit. After independently reviewing the entire record, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit agrees there are no issues of merit and affirms both Charlton's convictions and sentences. The motion to withdraw as counsel is granted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-12805

    Date Filed: 03/17/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-12805
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00505-RAL-EAJ-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    NORMAN V. CHARLTON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (March 17, 2015)
    Before HULL, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Norman Charlton in this direct
    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Charlton

    Case: 14-12805

    Date Filed: 03/17/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,
    18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
    counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Charltons convictions and
    sentences are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like