Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Bradford Ford, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Bradford Ford was convicted in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. His appointed counsel, David L. Roberts, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided a brief using the Anders procedure. After independently reviewing the full record, the three-judge panel found no issues of arguable merit and granted the motion to withdraw. They affirmed both Ford's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-06-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-14995

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Bradford Ford was convicted in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. His appointed counsel, David L. Roberts, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided a brief using the Anders procedure. After independently reviewing the full record, the three-judge panel found no issues of arguable merit and granted the motion to withdraw. They affirmed both Ford's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Bradford Ford, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Bradford Ford was convicted in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. His appointed counsel, David L. Roberts, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided a brief using the Anders procedure. After independently reviewing the full record, the three-judge panel found no issues of arguable merit and granted the motion to withdraw. They affirmed both Ford's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-14995

    Date Filed: 06/24/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-14995
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00008-CDL-MSH-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    BRADFORD FORD,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (June 24, 2015)
    Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-14995

    Date Filed: 06/24/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    David L. Roberts, appointed counsel for Bradford Ford, has filed a motion to
    withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
    Fords conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like