Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    United States v. Glenny Difo, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Glenny Difo's appointed counsel, Esther Panitch, has moved to withdraw from representing Difo in his direct criminal appeal. The brief filed by Panitch was pursuant to Anders v. California, which allows withdrawal from a case if it is deemed to have no arguable issues of merit. After independently reviewing the record, the court agrees there are no issues of merit and grants the motion to withdraw while affirming Difo's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Glenny Difo, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Glenny Difo's appointed counsel, Esther Panitch, has moved to withdraw from representing Difo in his direct criminal appeal. The brief filed by Panitch was pursuant to Anders v. California, which allows withdrawal from a case if it is deemed to have no arguable issues of merit. After independently reviewing the record, the court agrees there are no issues of merit and grants the motion to withdraw while affirming Difo's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-09-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-10029

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Glenny Difo's appointed counsel, Esther Panitch, has moved to withdraw from representing Difo in his direct criminal appeal. The brief filed by Panitch was pursuant to Anders v. California, which allows withdrawal from a case if it is deemed to have no arguable issues of merit. After independently reviewing the record, the court agrees there are no issues of merit and grants the motion to withdraw while affirming Difo's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    United States v. Glenny Difo, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It states that Glenny Difo's appointed counsel, Esther Panitch, has moved to withdraw from representing Difo in his direct criminal appeal. The brief filed by Panitch was pursuant to Anders v. California, which allows withdrawal from a case if it is deemed to have no arguable issues of merit. After independently reviewing the record, the court agrees there are no issues of merit and grants the motion to withdraw while affirming Difo's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 15-10029

    Date Filed: 09/10/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-10029
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00370-WSD-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    GLENNY DIFO,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (September 10, 2015)
    Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Esther Panitch, appointed counsel for Glenny Difo in this direct criminal
    appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has

    Case: 15-10029

    Date Filed: 09/10/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
    Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of
    the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
    entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is
    GRANTED, and Difos conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like