Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Vincent Lavett Allen, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It details that Vincent Lavett Allen's attorney, John Badalamenti, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided a brief under Anders v. California indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court's per curiam opinion affirmed the district court's decision to revoke Allen's supervised release and uphold his sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-09-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-10382

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It details that Vincent Lavett Allen's attorney, John Badalamenti, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided a brief under Anders v. California indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court's per curiam opinion affirmed the district court's decision to revoke Allen's supervised release and uphold his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Vincent Lavett Allen, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It details that Vincent Lavett Allen's attorney, John Badalamenti, filed a motion to withdraw from the case and provided a brief under Anders v. California indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court's per curiam opinion affirmed the district court's decision to revoke Allen's supervised release and uphold his sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 15-10382

    Date Filed: 09/30/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-10382
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 3:90-cr-00084-HES-JRK-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    VINCENT LAVETT ALLEN,
    Pork Chop,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (September 30, 2015)
    Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 15-10382

    Date Filed: 09/30/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    John Badalamenti, appointed counsel for Vincent Lavett Allen, has filed a
    motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the
    revocation of Allens supervised release and his sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like