Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    United States v. Herbert Siler, 11th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Herbert Siler's appointed counsel Michael Cohen filed a motion to withdraw from representing Siler in his direct criminal appeal. The court's independent review found no issues of merit to raise on appeal. As such, the court granted Cohen's motion to withdraw and affirmed both Siler's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Herbert Siler, 11th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Herbert Siler's appointed counsel Michael Cohen filed a motion to withdraw from representing Siler in his direct criminal appeal. The court's independent review found no issues of merit to raise on appeal. As such, the court granted Cohen's motion to withdraw and affirmed both Siler's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-04-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-14322

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Herbert Siler's appointed counsel Michael Cohen filed a motion to withdraw from representing Siler in his direct criminal appeal. The court's independent review found no issues of merit to raise on appeal. As such, the court granted Cohen's motion to withdraw and affirmed both Siler's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Herbert Siler, 11th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Herbert Siler's appointed counsel Michael Cohen filed a motion to withdraw from representing Siler in his direct criminal appeal. The court's independent review found no issues of merit to raise on appeal. As such, the court granted Cohen's motion to withdraw and affirmed both Siler's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    FILED
    ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 08-14322
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________

    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    APRIL 15, 2009
    THOMAS K. KAHN
    CLERK

    D. C. Docket No. 07-60289-CR-DMM


    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    HERBERT SILER,
    Defendant-Appellant.

    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    _________________________
    (April 15, 2009)
    Before: MARCUS, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges
    PER CURIAM:

    Michael B. Cohen, appointed counsel for Herbert Siler in this direct criminal
    appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
    filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
    L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
    counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Silers conviction and sentence
    are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like