Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Viacheslav Zhukov, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case involving Viacheslav Zhukov. Zhukov's appointed counsel, John D. Carson, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and also filed an Anders brief, which assesses the relative merit of the appeal. After reviewing the entire record, the court determined that there were no arguable issues of merit. As a result, the court granted Carson's motion to withdraw, affirmed Zhukov's conviction and sentence, and denied Zhukov's motion for appointment of counsel as moot.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-11-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-15527

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case involving Viacheslav Zhukov. Zhukov's appointed counsel, John D. Carson, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and also filed an Anders brief, which assesses the relative merit of the appeal. After reviewing the entire record, the court determined that there were no arguable issues of merit. As a result, the court granted Carson's motion to withdraw, affirmed Zhukov's conviction and sentence, and denied Zhukov's motion for appointment of counsel as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Viacheslav Zhukov, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case involving Viacheslav Zhukov. Zhukov's appointed counsel, John D. Carson, filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and also filed an Anders brief, which assesses the relative merit of the appeal. After reviewing the entire record, the court determined that there were no arguable issues of merit. As a result, the court granted Carson's motion to withdraw, affirmed Zhukov's conviction and sentence, and denied Zhukov's motion for appointment of counsel as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-15527

    Date Filed: 11/12/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-15527
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00196-WTM-GRS-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    VIACHESLAV ZHUKOV,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (November 12, 2015)
    Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-15527

    Date Filed: 11/12/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    John D. Carson, appointed counsel for Viacheslav Zhukov, has moved to


    withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
    Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
    independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the
    relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
    entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is
    GRANTED, Zhukovs conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and Zhukovs
    motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.

    You might also like