Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Timothy Starks, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reviewed an appeal by Timothy Starks of his criminal conviction. Starks' appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the entire court record independently, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit. Therefore, the court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed both Starks' conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-12-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-11519

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reviewed an appeal by Timothy Starks of his criminal conviction. Starks' appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the entire court record independently, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit. Therefore, the court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed both Starks' conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Timothy Starks, 11th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reviewed an appeal by Timothy Starks of his criminal conviction. Starks' appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the entire court record independently, the Eleventh Circuit agreed there were no issues of merit. Therefore, the court granted counsel's motion to withdraw and affirmed both Starks' conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-11519

    Date Filed: 12/09/2015

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-11519
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cr-20588-DMM-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    TIMOTHY STARKS,
    a.k.a. Tim Brown,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (December 9, 2015)
    Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-11519

    Date Filed: 12/09/2015

    Page: 2 of 2

    Mauricio Aldazabal, appointed counsel for Timothy Starks, in this direct


    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
    1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
    reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
    Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
    merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Starks=s conviction and
    sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like