Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    United States v. Cordell Jones, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Cordell Jones appealed his criminal conviction. Jones' appointed counsel, Angelo Ferlita, filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. The court also affirmed Jones' conviction and sentence and denied his motion for new counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Cordell Jones, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Cordell Jones appealed his criminal conviction. Jones' appointed counsel, Angelo Ferlita, filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. The court also affirmed Jones' conviction and sentence and denied his motion for new counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-02-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-10932

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Cordell Jones appealed his criminal conviction. Jones' appointed counsel, Angelo Ferlita, filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. The court also affirmed Jones' conviction and sentence and denied his motion for new counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Cordell Jones, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Cordell Jones appealed his criminal conviction. Jones' appointed counsel, Angelo Ferlita, filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, stating there were no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the record, the court agreed there were no issues of merit and granted the motion to withdraw. The court also affirmed Jones' conviction and sentence and denied his motion for new counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 15-10932

    Date Filed: 02/10/2016

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-10932
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00306-CEH-MAP-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    CORDELL JONES,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (February 10, 2016)
    Before TJOFLAT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 15-10932

    Date Filed: 02/10/2016

    Page: 2 of 2

    Angelo Ferlita, appointed counsel for Cordell Jones in this direct criminal
    appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
    filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.
    Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Moreover, Jones has filed a motion for appointment of new
    counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s
    assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
    examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s
    motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jones=s conviction and sentence are
    AFFIRMED. Joness motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

    You might also like