This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 15-14632. It states that Robert McCandless' appointed counsel, Darren Johnson, has moved to withdraw from representing McCandless in his direct criminal appeal and filed an Anders brief. After reviewing the entire record, the court's panel of judges finds no issues of merit and grants the motion to withdraw, affirming McCandless' convictions and sentences.
This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 15-14632. It states that Robert McCandless' appointed counsel, Darren Johnson, has moved to withdraw from representing McCandless in his direct criminal appeal and filed an Anders brief. After reviewing the entire record, the court's panel of judges finds no issues of merit and grants the motion to withdraw, affirming McCandless' convictions and sentences.
This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding case number 15-14632. It states that Robert McCandless' appointed counsel, Darren Johnson, has moved to withdraw from representing McCandless in his direct criminal appeal and filed an Anders brief. After reviewing the entire record, the court's panel of judges finds no issues of merit and grants the motion to withdraw, affirming McCandless' convictions and sentences.
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-14632 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cr-00003-RH-CAS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT W. MCCANDLESS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ (March 25, 2016) Before HULL, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-14632
Date Filed: 03/25/2016
Page: 2 of 2
Darren Johnson, appointed counsel for Robert McCandless in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McCandlesss convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.