Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Joy R. Webster v. FNF Servicing, Inc., 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendant. The plaintiffs had appealed the summary judgment on their three claims: (1) violation of the Georgia RICO statute, (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress, and (3) violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The appellate court concluded, based on the district court's order, that summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant on all three claims.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Joy R. Webster v. FNF Servicing, Inc., 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendant. The plaintiffs had appealed the summary judgment on their three claims: (1) violation of the Georgia RICO statute, (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress, and (3) violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The appellate court concluded, based on the district court's order, that summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant on all three claims.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-05-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-14513

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendant. The plaintiffs had appealed the summary judgment on their three claims: (1) violation of the Georgia RICO statute, (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress, and (3) violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The appellate court concluded, based on the district court's order, that summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant on all three claims.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Joy R. Webster v. FNF Servicing, Inc., 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendant. The plaintiffs had appealed the summary judgment on their three claims: (1) violation of the Georgia RICO statute, (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress, and (3) violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. The appellate court concluded, based on the district court's order, that summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant on all three claims.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 15-14513

    Date Filed: 05/23/2016

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-14513
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-00033-WLS
    JAMES L. KERFOOT, et al.,
    Plaintiffs,
    JOY R. WEBSTER,
    as Trustee in Bankruptcy for James and Sylvia Kerfoot,
    NATASHA GOLDEN,
    as Administratrix of the Estate of Sylvia F. Kerfoot,
    NATASHA GOLDEN,
    personal representative and administratrix of the Estate
    of James L. Kerfoot,
    Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    versus
    FNF SERVICING, INC.,
    a foreign corporation,
    d.b.a. Loan Care Serving Center, Inc.,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (May 23, 2016)

    Case: 15-14513

    Date Filed: 05/23/2016

    Page: 2 of 2

    Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and ROGERS,* Circuit Judges.


    PER CURIAM:
    Plaintiffs appeal the summary judgment the district court granted defendant
    on the three claims of their amended complaint: Count One, alleging a violation of
    the Georgia RICO statute, O.C.G.A. 16-14-1 et seq., Count Two, alleging a
    common law tort claim, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, and Count
    Three, alleging violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C.
    2605(e). Having heard oral argument from counsel for the parties and
    considered their briefs, we conclude for the reasons stated by the district court in
    its dispositive order of September 10, 2015, Doc. 122, that the district court
    properly granted defendant summary judgment.
    AFFIRMED.

    ____________
    *Honorable John M. Rogers, United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by
    designation.
    2

    You might also like