Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 11 Outline
Chapter 11 Outline
Chapter 11 Outline
EDU 655
Chapter 11 Outline
Designed to provide consistent and focused understanding regarding what students are expected to
learn.
o This awareness ultimately provides guidance for teachers and parents so that they are able to assist
students in acquiring relevant knowledge and skills that will enable them to succeed in college and
their professional careers.
o 47 States are members of the Common Core Standards Initiative.
Special Interest Groups and Public School Curriculum (pg. 293)
o These groups through their advocacy have effectively censored textbook versions of many of the
classical works in public schools across the U.S.
o These groups tend to represent either ultra conservatives or ultra-liberals, and many of these
groups have significant funds to support their cases.
o These groups put extreme pressure on school boards and the National School Board Association
recommends that school boards develop policies on how the board will receive input from special
interest groups in their communities.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (pg. 294)
o Federal Government's way to get more involved in public education.
o Most comprehensive and sweeping act since Elementary and Secondary School act that passed in
1965
Four Principals
Stronger accountability for results
Increased flexibility and local control
Expanded options for parents
An emphasis on teaching methods that have been proven to work
Increased accountability
o Statewide accountability systems
o Annual testing
o Assessment results and state progress including the following
Income, race, ethnicity, disability, and limited english proficiency
Choices for parents and students
o Gives students option to leave one district and attend another better public school
o Students options to receive tutoring and other education services, paid by district
o This will help low achieving schools feel the need to improve and become better
Flexibility for States, School Districts, and Schools
o New life for flexibility for accountability
o Transfer moneys to other programs
Teacher Quality state grants, Educational Technology state grants, Innovative Programs,
and Safe and Drug-Free Schools
Summary and Implications
o Accountability, Students cannot be left behind based on:
Race/Ethnicity, disabilities Limited English Proficiency, Economic Status
o Participation, students with disabilities who take alternative assessments must participate, schools
must have 95% participation rate for all students
o AYP, Same standards apply to all students, separate students into groups to see how progress is
going
o Public school choice, students who attend low achieving schools for 2 or more consecutive years
have the choice to opt to a higher performing school
o Supplemental services, students who attend low achieving schools for 2 or more consecutive years
have the choice to receive supplemental services
o Unsafe school choice, students who attend persistently dangerous schools have the choice to opt to
other districts
School Improvement
o Schools are required to have a plan in place for school improvement if the schools fails to meet
AYP
o
EDU 655
Chapter 11 Outline
EDU 655
Chapter 11 Outline
Achievement standards for environmental education
Bill amends part B (Math and Science)
Training to provide environmental education
Activities that such programs fund at community learning centers
All before and after school programs
Intellectual Property and Fair Use (pg. 300)
o Covers 4 basic areas
Patents, trademarks, designs, and copyright materials
o Copyright and fair use guidelines are extensive and need to be followed
o On pages 301 to 303 are a list of Medium Materials that have copyright and fair use guidelines on
them. Please look over these pages to make sure no infringement is occurring
Use of the Internet for Instruction (pg. 303)
o Filtering software and an Internet safety policy should be used in accordance to the Childrens
Internet Protection Act of 2000. This law includes libraries and schools that receive discounted
rates as part of the E-Rate program or under Title II of the ESEA. However, the courts upheld that
the filtering part of the law is unconstitutional for ONLY libraries due to the First Amendment.
o Schools district should develop and enforce an acceptable use policy for all electronic
programming for employees and students. The school board will not incur liability if the filter
fails. Due process should take place if a student or employee violates the policy in order to be
banned from the Internet.
o Teachers should review websites to determine appropriateness for the students.
Grading and Academic Requirements (pg. 307)
o Requirements regarding students progress from one grade to another are not usually reviewed by
the courts unless there is substantial evidence of unfairness.
o The state has the authority for promotion and graduation requirements.
o Courts do not feel equipped to evaluate academic matters., so they limit themselves to due
process, discriminatory impact, or capricious acts by school officials.
o Many challenges for the court include minimal competency tests. The common challenge is
whether tests are used for tracking and if the test results in discrimination which is a violation of
the Fourteenth Amendment.
o Courts generally support reasonable policies for grade reductions for excessive absences if they
dont conflict with state statutes.
o Schools commonly penalize students academically for unexcused absences or truancy and courts
have been more supportive of schools on this rule.
o Many schools have policies on student academic misconduct. In Dunn and McCullough v.
Fairfield Community High School, the court decided that there was no violation in Illinois law for
the school when the students played their guitars during a band program and failed their class.
o Physical punishment of public school students for academic standards have not been supported by
the courts. One court ruled against physical punishment of a student who did not perform
athletically at a desired level and even though the coach said that the punishment was instructive
and encouragement to others.
o School officials have the authority to determine when a student has met the requirements to
receive a diploma; however, a student can be denied participation in the graduate ceremony if their
conduct deviates from acceptable standards of behavior.
o
N. L. Essex (2012). School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, (6th Edition).
Pearson Education, Inc.