Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sportdrink - JACN
Sportdrink - JACN
Sportdrink - JACN
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44570466
CITATIONS
READS
28
98
10 authors, including:
Federico Marini
Giorgio Capuani
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Maurizio Paci
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Original Research
INTRODUCTION
Address reprint requests to: Alfredo Miccheli, Dipartimento di Chimica, Sapienza Universita` di Roma, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, ITALY. E-mail:
alfredo.miccheli@uniroma1.it
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 28, No. 5, 553564 (2009)
Published by the American College of Nutrition
553
554
4.2
3.2
254
57
46
14
25
2.6
g
g
mg
mg
mg
mg
mg
mg
Sample Pretreatment
Plasma. Blood samples were drawn into Li/Heparine
vacuum containers (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Plasma was
separated by centrifugation and immediately frozen at 280uC.
Afterward, 700 ml of each sample was deproteinized by
ultrafiltration with 10-kD filters (Amicon Ultra-4; Millipore,
Billerica, MA) according to a previously reported procedure
[18]. A total of 500 ml of the resulting solution was added to
100 ml of a PBS-buffered D2O solution containing the sodium
salt of trimethylsilyl-2,2,3,3-tetradeuteropropionic acid (TSP;
2 mM final concentration) as a quantitative and chemical shift
reference; the resulting pH was 7.2. The final number of
subjects included in the study was 24 due to the drop out of
some of the athletes or to accidental causes, such as hemolysis.
This led to 144 plasma samples.
Urine. Urine samples were collected, centrifuged, sterilized
by 0.22-mm filtration (Millipore), and frozen at 280uC.
Samples for NMR analysis were prepared by taking a 700-ml
aliquot and adding 70 ml of a solution of 20.2-mM TSP in D2O
(2 mM final concentration). The pH was adjusted to 2.5 with
HCl 2N. A total of 600 ml of the resulting solution was
analyzed. The total number of subjects was 31, which yielded
124 urine samples.
1
555
RESULTS
1
H NMR Spectra
1
Plasma Samples
Multivariate Data Analysis on the Different Subsets.
After splitting the data set into these blocks, each block was
analyzed separately to explore the metabolic sources of the
systematic variations observed. In particular, principal component analysis on the between-subjects data block was used to
identify the metabolites that are mainly responsible for the
difference among individuals. On the other hand, since our
556
Urine Samples
A similar data analysis protocol was followed in the case of
the urine data set: again, the total variation was split into the
557
d (ppm)
Multiplicity
0.83
0.88
1.00
1.03
1.07
1.13
1.16
1.21
1.27
1.34
1.46
1.50
1.92
2.13
2.23
2.28
2.38
2.372.44
2.522.56
2.993.06
3.05
3.20
3.23
3.24
3.27
3.28
3.38
3.42
3.55
3.97
4.06
4.11
5.24
6.85
7.01
7.16
7.277.45
7.69
7.72
8.46
d
t
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
s
s
s
s
s
m
dd
m
s
s
s
m
s
s
s
m
m
s
s
q
d
d
s
d
m
s
s
s
CH3 2-Hydroxyvalerate
CH3 2-Hydroxybutyrate
cCH3 Isoleucine
CH3 Valine
CH3 3-Hydroxyisobutyrate
CH3 Isobutyrate
0.54
0.94
1.03
1.16
1.26
1.33
1.34
1.41
1.44
1.52
1.57
2.08
2.22
2.33
2.34
2.38
2.72
2.92
m
m
dd
d
d
s
d
d
s
d
s
s
s
s
t
s
t
dd
Metabolite
Plasma
2-OH-Vale
2-OH-But
Ileu
Val
(R)3-OH-IsoBut
IsoBut
U1
(R)3-OH-But
Thr
Lac1
Ala
U2
Ac
Met
Acetone
AcAc
Pyr
Gln+Suc
Cit
2-OxoGlut+Lys+Cr
Crn1
Cho
U3
Glc1
TMAO
U4
U5
Glc2
Glc3
U6
Crn2
Lac2
Glc4
Tyr1
His1
Tyr2
Phe
1-MetHis
His2
For
Urine
Biliaric acids
Ile+Leu
Val
2Met3OHBut
3OHBut
3OHIsovale
Thr
Lac
2OHIsoBut
Ala
U1
Ac
Acetone
AcAc
N-AcGln
Pyr
DMA
Cit
558
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
3-Hydroxybutyrate
Threonine
Lactate
Alanine
CH3 Acetate
CH3 Methionine
CH3 Acetone
CH3 Acetoacetate
CH3 Pyruvate
cCH2 Glutamine + CH2 Succinate
CH2 Citrate
aCH2 2-Oxoglutarate, eCH2 Lysine, CH3 Creatine
CH3 Creatinine
CH3 Choline
H2 Glucose
CH3 Trimethylamine oxide
H5,7 Glucose
H3 Glucose
CH2 Creatinine
CH Lactate
H11 Glucose
H2,6 Tyrosine
H5 Hystidine
H3,5 Tyrosine
H2,3,4,5,6 Phenylalanine
H4 1-Metylhistidine
H2 Histidine
H Formate
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH2
Acetic acid
Acetone
Acetoacetate
N-acetylglutamine
Pyruvate
Dimethylamine
Citrate
d (ppm)
Multiplicity
3.11
3.13
3.19
3.23
3.32
3.34
3.35
3.50
3.54
3.86
3.88
4.18
4.2
4.29
4.44
5.79
5.84
5.92
6.36
7.037.18
7.297.44
7.55
7.64
8.00
8.24
8.25
8.32
8.49
8.63
8.68
8.69
8.82
8.88
9.20
9.27
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
d
s
s
s
d
d
m
s
m
m
pseudo-t
pseudo-t
s
s
s
d
s
s
s
s
m
t
s
m
Metabolite
CH3 Creatine
CH3 Creatinine
CH3
CH2
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH2
(C12)caffeine
scyllo-inositol
Methanol
(C14)caffeine
Trimethylamine oxide
1-Metylhistidine, U4
3-Metylhistidine, U5
Hippurate
CH2 Creatinine
CH3 Trigonelline
H5 Uracil
H2 Guanosine
Hypoxanthine
3-Methylhistidine
Histidine
1-Methylhistidine
H5,3 Trigonelline
H1 Trigonelline
U 5 unassigned. Multiplicity abbreviations: s 5 singlet, d 5 doublet, t 5 triplet, dd 5 double doublet, q 5 quadruplet, m 5 multiplet.
contributions of the offset, the between- and the withinindividual terms. The contribution of each of the terms to the
total variation is comparable to that observed in the plasma
data set. Indeed, the offset term contributes to 28.25% of the
total variation, with the remaining 71.75% being due to
intraindividual and interindividual factors that contribute
almost to the same extent (36.98% for the between-individual
and 34.77% for the within-individual variability).
559
Fig. 2. Variable importance for prediction (VIP) score of variables from the PLS-DA analysis of plasma within-individual data subset.
Q
q
2-OxoGlut+Lys+Cr*
Glucose*
q
q
Q
q
q
q
q
Q
Caffeine (Thein)*
1-MetHis+U4
Hipp1
U6
U9*
Phe+His
q
q
q
Q
Q
q
Urine
Valine
3-Hydroxybutyrate
Lactate
Acetate
Acetone*
U3
560
metabolic effect of the drink itself, VIP scores and the PLS
regression coefficients were also analyzed in this case. With
respect to plasma, a larger number of variables show a
significant value of the VIP score, with the most outstanding
being U9, lactate, caffeine, acetone, 1-methylhistidine, 3hydroxybutyrate, acetate, U3, hippuric acid, U6, and
phenylalanine+histidine (Fig. 5). Inspection of the directions
of changes indicated by the regression coefficients and
reported in Table 3 further facilitates the interpretation of the
results of PLS-DA analysis by indicating the metabolites
whose levels increase and those that decrease after ingestion
of the sports drink. With reference to the differences between
postexercise recovery and the rest condition, caffeine (theine)
and hippurate in urine showed positive delta values (+0.5 6
5.6 and +10.5 6 9.6 mmol/mmol creatinine, respectively) in
athletes who ingested the sports beverage and negative delta
values in athletes ingesting only water (24.7 6 9.9 and
213.8 6 7.7 mmol/mmol creatinine, respectively), although
only caffeine delta values were significantly different (p 5
0.024 by paired Students t test). A significant variation in
delta values was also displayed by acetone, which increased
in athletes who ingested the sports beverage (2.6 6 2.2 and
1.3 6 1.6 mmol/mmol creatinine in the sports beverage and
water group, respectively, p 5 0.013, by paired Students t
test).
Fig. 3. Loadings of the first principal component of the betweenindividuals subsets from plasma (A) and urine (B).
PLS-DA analysis included also delta values of 3-hydroxybutyrate, acetate, valine, and phenylalanine+histidine as
variables discriminating between the sports beverage and the
water group, although they did not show significant differences
in the paired Students t test.
Analysis of Between-Individual Variation. As in the
analysis of plasma data, also in the case of the urine data set
the sources of variation in metabolite concentration due to
differences among individuals was taken into account by
performing a PCA analysis on the between-subjects block Xb,
after suitable scaling. Pareto scaling was also used in this case
for the reasons already given. As observed in the case of the
plasma samples, a large proportion of the between-individuals
variability is explained by the first principal component. A
careful inspection of the loading plot in Fig. 3B confirms what
already emerges from an analysis of the plasma data set, that
is, that lactate (the only variable having a significant loading
on PC1) is the metabolite whose concentration varies the most
among the subjects.
DISCUSSION
In the past few years, nutritional metabolomics has been
shown to be a successful approach to the investigation of the
difference between the effects of different diets on human
health, deepening our knowledge of the interacting and
regulatory roles of nutrition [15,16]. More recently, metabolomics has been also applied in sports medicine studies to
investigate the physiological alterations of the metabolic
profile induced by strenuous physical exercise [22] and longterm training in athletes [23].
In this study, NMR-based metabolomics analysis has been
applied to the investigation of the nutritional impact of a green
teabased isotonic sports beverage on the metabolism of
Olympic team rowers during recovery after strenuous physical
exercise. To compare the effect of the sports drink at the
individual level with respect to oligomineral water as a placebo
control, we performed a double-blind crossover-designed study
also entailing the use of a specific multivariate analysis,
561
Fig. 5. VIP score of variables from the PLS-DA analysis of urine within-individual data subset.
562
CONCLUSION
This study represents an original demonstration that NMRbased metabolomics allows the complex metabolic effects of a
green tea extractbased carbohydrate/hydroelectrolyte beverage to be evaluated in athletes during the recovery phase after
physical exercise. In particular, the metabolomic approach in
which MSCA/PLS-DA is used in a double-blind cross-over
designed study allowed us to investigate the effect of a
nutritional intervention on energy metabolism at the individual
level, although the observed changes were smaller than the
biological variations between individuals.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the Italian Rowing Federation and COOP
ITALIA for their financial support, as well as to the Institute of
Sports Medicine and Science, Italian National Olympic
Committee (Rome, Italy), for logistic support and subsidiary
laboratory analyses.
REFERENCES
1. Maughan RJ: Fluid and electrolyte loss and replacement in
exercise. In Harries M, Williams C, Stanish WD, Micheli LL
(eds): Oxford Textbook of Sports Medicine. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press, pp 8293, 1994.
563
564