Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Benjamin Caine, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed Benjamin Caine's conviction and sentence in a short unpublished opinion. Caine's attorney filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal and granted the attorney's motion to withdraw, affirming Caine's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-15379

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed Benjamin Caine's conviction and sentence in a short unpublished opinion. Caine's attorney filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal and granted the attorney's motion to withdraw, affirming Caine's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Benjamin Caine, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed Benjamin Caine's conviction and sentence in a short unpublished opinion. Caine's attorney filed a motion to withdraw from further representation and an Anders brief, indicating there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the court agreed there were no meritorious issues for appeal and granted the attorney's motion to withdraw, affirming Caine's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 13-15379

    Date Filed: 07/02/2014

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 13-15379
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00011-MMH-MCR-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    BENJAMIN CAINE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (July 2, 2014)
    Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 13-15379

    Date Filed: 07/02/2014

    Page: 2 of 2

    Tracy N. DaCruz, counsel for Benjamin Caine, has moved to withdraw from
    further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
    review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of
    the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
    no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion is GRANTED, and Caines
    conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like