Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    United States v. Jaques D. Randolph, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Thomas Burns, the appointed counsel for Jaques Randolph, to withdraw from representing Randolph in his direct criminal appeal. The court's independent review of the entire record found no arguable issues of merit to raise. As a result, the court affirmed both Randolph's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Jaques D. Randolph, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Thomas Burns, the appointed counsel for Jaques Randolph, to withdraw from representing Randolph in his direct criminal appeal. The court's independent review of the entire record found no arguable issues of merit to raise. As a result, the court affirmed both Randolph's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-09-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-10941

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Thomas Burns, the appointed counsel for Jaques Randolph, to withdraw from representing Randolph in his direct criminal appeal. The court's independent review of the entire record found no arguable issues of merit to raise. As a result, the court affirmed both Randolph's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    United States v. Jaques D. Randolph, 11th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Thomas Burns, the appointed counsel for Jaques Randolph, to withdraw from representing Randolph in his direct criminal appeal. The court's independent review of the entire record found no arguable issues of merit to raise. As a result, the court affirmed both Randolph's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 14-10941

    Date Filed: 09/16/2014

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-10941
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00565-RAL-EAJ-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JAQUES D. RANDOLPH,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (September 16, 2014)
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 14-10941

    Date Filed: 09/16/2014

    Page: 2 of 2

    Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Jaques Randolph in this direct


    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
    1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
    that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Randolphs conviction and
    sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like