Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    United States v. Edward Valentin, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Edward Valentin's appointed counsel, Stephen J. Langs, to withdraw from representing Valentin in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the panel of judges agreed with Langs' assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed both Valentin's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Edward Valentin, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Edward Valentin's appointed counsel, Stephen J. Langs, to withdraw from representing Valentin in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the panel of judges agreed with Langs' assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed both Valentin's conviction and sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2016-06-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-15082

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Edward Valentin's appointed counsel, Stephen J. Langs, to withdraw from representing Valentin in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the panel of judges agreed with Langs' assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed both Valentin's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    United States v. Edward Valentin, 11th Cir. (2016)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Edward Valentin's appointed counsel, Stephen J. Langs, to withdraw from representing Valentin in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the entire record, the panel of judges agreed with Langs' assessment that there were no arguable issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed both Valentin's conviction and sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    Case: 15-15082

    Date Filed: 06/22/2016

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-15082
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 6:15-cr-00082-CEM-DAB-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    EDWARD VALENTIN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (June 22, 2016)
    Before WILSON, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Case: 15-15082

    Date Filed: 06/22/2016

    Page: 2 of 2

    Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Edward Valentin in this direct


    criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
    1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
    reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
    Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
    merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Valentin=s conviction and
    sentence is AFFIRMED.

    You might also like