Thank you Chris Woodrich, and how about this one and the photos uploaded here?

T
hanks. Mhhossein (talk) 19:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
I can't open the source for Avini2. The Flickr one seems to be a series of scree
nshots. If that's the case, the uploader probably doesn't have the right to rele
ase it under a free license.
Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm afraid, not all those photos on Flickr were screenshots! btw, this's the lin
k to Avini2 and you may also consider this one. Mhhossein (talk) 05:39, 13 July
2016 (UTC)
All of those Flickr photos are listed as having been taken in 2002 or later, and
Avini died in 1993. The photographer cannot, therefore, be the one who created
the original images. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------* The article underwent a rather comprehensive copy edit. Also, I added some new
materials and tried to address the concerns raised by the reviewers. Besides, I
found a photo of Avini which is recently uploaded by the photographer Ehsan Raj
abi, according to the description page. The photo is also seen on his personal w
ebsite. --Mhhossein (talk) 12:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Symbol delete vote.svgI think this is an important article but I see numerous is
sues with it and said so on the talk page. Article's formal issues are:
language is at times unencyclopedic, unusual terms are used without quotation ma
rks, some sentences are wrongly constructed.
There are unsourced claims that appear to be very important.( US stay, studies)
plain unclear: there are facts alluded to, that actually need expansion. (US sta
y, studies)
Half the references are to Bookroom.ir in Persian.
almost all references are undated, and no pages given, ie incomplete referencing
.
Article's content issues:
WP:NPOV: I dont think the article is neutral. It has a slant towards glorifying
the subject. Part of this may be the one-sided sources.
WP:UNDUE: The subsection 'Style' is unbalanced. Three quarter is referenced to o
ne work by a certain redlinked Agnes Devictor, with a source that is a dead link
.
Hook ALT2 :
Doesn't appear interesting to me, but entirely predictableWuerzele (talk) 03:26,
24 July 2016 (UTC)
@Wuerzele: I found much of your points unacceptable because:
Bookroom.ir, as a source for introducing Persian books, is almost only used in '
Bibliography' to introduce Avini's books. What's wrong with this?
As far as I'm concerned, Agnes Devictor has done his Ph.D regarding Avini profes
sional film career and some parts of his life. Devictor's work is an academic th
ird party and hence reliable source, why not use it? By the way, I have no idea
how you found this link dead!
Whether the sources are dated or not, paged or not is not something to be retard
ing article's progress in DYK. Nothing requires us to have the sources dated or
paged. However, I can tell the pages if there are challenging claim.
All the points, including Avini's studying in US, is well referenced in the arti
cle. I found no sources going through the details.
As you see, thanks to GeneralizationsAreBad, the article has undergone almost 2
rounds of copy edits and I don't think your claim is acceptable, unless you can
show us specifically what you mean!
Can you please show us what sections have "a slant towards glorifying the subjec
t"? Mhhossein (talk) 07:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
By the way, I was surprised to see that you could predict Avini's title, "the ma

ster of martyred literati"! Mhhossein (talk) 07:37, 24 July 2016 (UTC)