This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Tiquela N. Murray. Murray's appointed counsel has moved to withdraw from representation and filed a brief under Anders v. California indicating there are no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the entire record, the court's panel of judges agrees with counsel's assessment and grants the motion to withdraw, affirming both Murray's conviction and sentence.
This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Tiquela N. Murray. Murray's appointed counsel has moved to withdraw from representation and filed a brief under Anders v. California indicating there are no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the entire record, the court's panel of judges agrees with counsel's assessment and grants the motion to withdraw, affirming both Murray's conviction and sentence.
This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Tiquela N. Murray. Murray's appointed counsel has moved to withdraw from representation and filed a brief under Anders v. California indicating there are no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the entire record, the court's panel of judges agrees with counsel's assessment and grants the motion to withdraw, affirming both Murray's conviction and sentence.
This document is a court filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Tiquela N. Murray. Murray's appointed counsel has moved to withdraw from representation and filed a brief under Anders v. California indicating there are no arguable issues of merit to appeal. After reviewing the entire record, the court's panel of judges agrees with counsel's assessment and grants the motion to withdraw, affirming both Murray's conviction and sentence.
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 13-14892 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00275-JRH-BKE-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TIQUELA N. MURRAY, a.k.a. Kisha Jones, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ________________________ (August 11, 2014) Before WILSON, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-14892
Date Filed: 08/11/2014
Page: 2 of 2
Andrew A. Murdison, appointed counsel for Tiquela N. Murray, has moved
to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motion is GRANTED, and Murrays conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.