This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It summarizes the dismissal of an appeal from Peter Michalsky against the City of New York. The city's motion to dismiss was granted because the complaint failed to state a valid claim. Both the court and the city stated that they did not understand the basis of Michalsky's alleged cause of action. It appears to be a claim of false imprisonment with no foundation, as Michalsky had already pleaded guilty and paid a fine for jaywalking in state court. Additionally, the amount in question was insufficient to establish federal jurisdiction. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It summarizes the dismissal of an appeal from Peter Michalsky against the City of New York. The city's motion to dismiss was granted because the complaint failed to state a valid claim. Both the court and the city stated that they did not understand the basis of Michalsky's alleged cause of action. It appears to be a claim of false imprisonment with no foundation, as Michalsky had already pleaded guilty and paid a fine for jaywalking in state court. Additionally, the amount in question was insufficient to establish federal jurisdiction. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It summarizes the dismissal of an appeal from Peter Michalsky against the City of New York. The city's motion to dismiss was granted because the complaint failed to state a valid claim. Both the court and the city stated that they did not understand the basis of Michalsky's alleged cause of action. It appears to be a claim of false imprisonment with no foundation, as Michalsky had already pleaded guilty and paid a fine for jaywalking in state court. Additionally, the amount in question was insufficient to establish federal jurisdiction. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee. No. 124, Docket 28361.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 1, 1963. Decided Nov. 19, 1963.
Peter Michalsky, pro se.
Leo A. Larkin, Corp. Counsel, for appellee, Seymour B. Quel, New York City, of counsel. Before SWAN, CLARK and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
This appeal was taken on submission without argument. Defendant's motion to
dismiss was made pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The affidavit in support of the motion stated that the affiant 'fails to understand the basis of the cause of action of the plaintiff' and further stated that the requirements of the General Municipal Law with respect to suing the City had not been followed. We also do not understand the basis of the alleged cause of action. It would seem to be a claim of false imprisonment with little or no basis, since the plaintiff had pleaded guilty and paid a fine in the state court for 'jay walking' at a busy street intersection in New York City. Apparently the suit was brought in the federal court on the ground of diversity, as the plaintiff resides in New Jersey. But the amount involved, $3,000 'doubled,' is insufficient to support federal jurisdiction. Accordingly the appeal must be dismissed. It is so ordered.
United States of America Ex Rel. Roosevelt Stevenson v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden, Attica State Prison, Attica, New York, 409 F.2d 801, 2d Cir. (1969)
United States of America Ex Rel. Burton N. Pugach v. Hon. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden, Attica State Prison, Attica, New York, 411 F.2d 177, 2d Cir. (1969)
Cyril Edwards v. E.W. Jones, Superintendent, Great Meadows Correctional Facility and Robert Abrams, Attorney General of The State of New York, 720 F.2d 751, 2d Cir. (1983)
United States of America and Alexander Dombroski, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Joseph G. Bowman, As President of Joseph G. Bowman, Inc., 435 F.2d 467, 3rd Cir. (1970)
United States of America Ex Rel. Edward Mitchell, Relator-Appellee v. Hon. Harold Follette, Warden, Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New York, 358 F.2d 922, 2d Cir. (1966)
United States of America Ex Rel. Willie Combs v. Hon. Wilfred L. Denno, As Warden of Sing Sing Prison, Ossining, New York, 357 F.2d 809, 2d Cir. (1966)
United States of America Ex Rel. William Cadogan v. Hon. J. Edwin Lavallee, As Warden of Clinton State Prison, Dannemora, New York, 428 F.2d 165, 2d Cir. (1970)