This document discusses genetic testing for Huntington's disease in minors. It summarizes several studies that have examined the psychological effects of such testing. The studies found that testing can increase depression, hopelessness, anxiety and distress in minors. However, the long term impacts are still unknown since more research over longer periods is needed. The document concludes that while testing may provide benefits like planning, it also risks psychological harm to minors that may not be developmentally ready to process the results. More research is still required to determine if testing minors for Huntington's disease is ethical.
This document discusses genetic testing for Huntington's disease in minors. It summarizes several studies that have examined the psychological effects of such testing. The studies found that testing can increase depression, hopelessness, anxiety and distress in minors. However, the long term impacts are still unknown since more research over longer periods is needed. The document concludes that while testing may provide benefits like planning, it also risks psychological harm to minors that may not be developmentally ready to process the results. More research is still required to determine if testing minors for Huntington's disease is ethical.
This document discusses genetic testing for Huntington's disease in minors. It summarizes several studies that have examined the psychological effects of such testing. The studies found that testing can increase depression, hopelessness, anxiety and distress in minors. However, the long term impacts are still unknown since more research over longer periods is needed. The document concludes that while testing may provide benefits like planning, it also risks psychological harm to minors that may not be developmentally ready to process the results. More research is still required to determine if testing minors for Huntington's disease is ethical.
The Effects of Genetic Testing for Huntingtons disease in Minors
Michelle Larsen English 2010 Salt Lake Community College
THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HUNTINGTONS DISEASE IN
MINORS 2 One of the most controversial subjects in medicine is the debate on genetic testing. And testing for a genetic disorder so rare, only 1 in 10,000 people have it (Nordqvist, Web), can bring many heated arguments to the table. Huntington's disease, of all the genetic disorders one can acquire, is the most relentless and cruel. With "no effective treatment," death is inevitable (Munson, p. 221). For those that carry the gene, they have a fifty-fifty chance of passing it along to their offspring. And for those that inherit the gene, the chances of developing the disease are one hundred percent. Testing for the disease is still fairly new, which explains the controversy surrounding it. In 1993, researchers found that the gene was identifiable on chromosome 4; after this was discovered, a "genetic tests for [the presence of Huntington's disease] was quickly developed" (Munson, p. 222). Like most genetic testing available, one can decide if they wish to find out if they carry a particular gene, or they can opt to have their future children tested in vitro. Much of the controversy surrounding this debate stems from the question about whether or not testing minors for the disease is ethical. Many studies have been done about the psychological effects of testing for a deadly disease at such a young age, and whether the benefit outweighs the potential harm in these instances. By taking a closer look and examining the effects of testing for such a fatal genetic
THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HUNTINGTONS DISEASE IN
MINORS 3 disorder in young people, it can become easier to decide if such testing is necessary. The National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) addressed psychological impacts of the predictive test for Huntingtons disease in September of 2014. Their aim in studying these effects was to approach the positive and negative impacts on an individuals life, including loss of hope and distress or relief and an increased appreciation for life (Crozier, Robertson, Dale, p. 30). In examining the psychological effects of genetic testing, they found that there were increased levels of distress in those being tested for Huntingtons disease, more so than for any other genetic disorder (Crozier, et al. p. 30). They concluded, There may be different psychological impacts of predictive testing depending on disease type (Crozier, et al. p. 31). This prompted them to further study the effects of Huntingtons specifically. In November of 2013, The NSCG conducted eight different studies involving individuals 18 years and younger and based their results on each individuals idea of how severe the disease was, treatments that could be offered, and the timing of when the disease might occur. The criteria for measuring the psychological effects involved examining the number of individuals after testing with symptoms such as depression, hopelessness, anxiety, distress, negative outlook on overall well-being, and self-injurious/suicidal tendencies. At the end of these studies, they found that there we more
THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HUNTINGTONS DISEASE IN
MINORS 4 cases of depression and hopelessness than any of the other symptoms, as it appeared in seven of the eight studies (Crozier et al., p. 32). In their conclusion of these studies they acknowledged the fact that predictive testing may have impacts on a persons psychological wellbeing, but given that this was the first time they examined these effects closely, it was hard to say for sure. They realized that further testing would need to be done to provide a broader view of the impacts in the long term, rather than just examining results from this short time frame (Crozier et al., p. 36). The data found based on their study is not sufficient enough to determine if there are psychological effects based specifically on this predictive test for Huntingtons disease or whether it is a coincidence. However, the data does not disprove the original hypothesis, leading to the logical belief that more evidence should be collected. In 2015 an article was published in the journal Clinical Genetics titled, "Help or Hindrance: Young People's Experiences of Predictive Testing for Huntington's disease." In this article, it describes how a study was done to evaluate the "psychological and social challenges" that young people can face after deciding to be tested for this genetic disorder (K. Forrest Keenan, L. McKee, Z. Miedzybrodzka, p. 563). Researchers conducted a study involving twelve individuals who were twenty-five years old and younger. The study was prompted by their initial thoughts suggesting that predictive testing for Huntington's
THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HUNTINGTONS DISEASE IN
MINORS 5 disease did not lead to increased rates of suicide or psychiatric illness. After the study, they found that the subjects described their experience in a variety of ways, from "a journey of empowerment, "or "an ambivalent process," to "a poor experience" (K. Forrest Keenan et al., p. 564). The individuals who saw this testing process as empowering were most likely considering the fact that they now knew what to expect, and could plan for their future families or other aspects of life accordingly. For those that saw it as a poor experience, anxiety and worry about the outcome of the test were main contributors. So far, it is apparent that there are similarities between the study conducted by the NSCG and the study evaluated by the Clinical Genetics journal. They both studied psychological effects in minors and the impacts on their emotional well-being that certain test results could cause. However, in the second study discussed, the initial reason for conducting the study was the hypothesis that predicted there were no long-term psychological effects. In the follow-up phase of the 2015 study, the author voiced his concern that "the young people did not anticipate the effects on their family members" (K. Forrest Keenan, et al., p. 568). When taking a look at how these young individuals felt about their test results, much of the anxiety and distress was related to how they felt about sharing the results with family or friends. At the conclusion of the study, they found that the experiences in predictive testing were similar to those of
THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HUNTINGTONS DISEASE IN
MINORS 6 adults and that any issues found were related to the subjects' stage of development (establishment of personal identity or maturity level, for example) (K. Forrest Keenan et al., p. 569.) Much like other studies that have been conducted and like the first study discussed, the author also stated: further testing is needed to explore the long-term outcomes for young people who seek predictive testing for Huntingtons disease (K. Forrest Keenan, et al., p. 570). For this study, additional follow-up in the next twenty years could help with identifying the presence of positive or negative psychological impacts. By following up with this study, they can gain long-term information, which will help in any other testing they might pursue. When considering the psychological effects that one can experience in the process of being tested for an incurable and fatal disease like Huntingtons, it is helpful to look at the ethical aspects this presents. Since there is the possibility of an individual experiencing depression or anxiety, for example, one may wonder if being tested is worth the additional internal struggle. One article attempted to study this. In an article titled, Ethical Aspects of Undergoing a Predictive Genetic Test for Huntingtons disease, the authors examine these psychological effects from a life history perspective (Andersson, Juth, Petersn, Graff, Edburg, p. 190). This study prompted the researchers with a Sweden university to follow one person who was at risk for
THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HUNTINGTONS DISEASE IN
MINORS 7 carrying the gene for the course of the testing process and for several months thereafter. They found that in the time leading up to getting the results, impatience was the cause of most of the distress, rather than worry about what the outcome might be. Since there are many steps in the process of testing someone's DNA, it can take several seemingly long weeks to get results. After the results were in is when the inner turmoil began. The author described the subject's experience as "chaos and despair" (Andersson, et al. p. 193). After hearing that the test was positive, the subject panicked about her diagnosis, realizing that she would inevitably develop Huntington's disease. In the following months, she became depressed and lived with denial about how severe her symptoms might become, but she was hopeful that she would overcome her fate and remain healthy. Though the initial results of the test brought much grief and stress, she was able to remain optimistic about the future in regards to her genetic condition. The consequences for the subject and her family give us the chance to think about whether or not being able to predict whether some [will develop] a serious disease in the future is associated with several ethical issues (Andersson, et al., p. 197). They concluded that the individuals who undergo this predictive test should be mature enough to handle the emotional strains that almost certainly follow this type of news. Since this disease is passed down from generation to generation, some might decide that testing is a
THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HUNTINGTONS DISEASE IN
MINORS 8 smart decision, as long as the person being tested is old enough to understand the implications of what they are doing. Like the first two studies mentioned previously, where studies specifically tested young individuals, it is seen that there are many risks associated with allowing young individuals with developing minds make the decision to be tested. Maturity level seems to be a recurring theme. Symptoms of depression and anxiety are often mentioned as occurring after results from genetic tests are discovered. Though there are many studies designated to the research of impacts these genetic tests can have on young individuals, it is seldom stated who decides to test these young people. At this present time, any medical consent needed from minors if provided by their parents. This is due to the fact that there are no widely accepted standards for weighing parents desires against those of their children (D. Wertz, J. Fanor, P. Reilly, 1994, p. 875). If a child up to the age of 18 is considered at risk for having the gene for Huntington's disease, the decision from their parents outweighs any personal decision they may wish to make. In the case of children too young to understand these implications, future psychosocial outcomes and impacts are often overlooked by the adult responsible for the child's consent. Because of this, the International Huntington's Association recommended that minors should not be tested for the disease (D. Wertz, et al., 1994, pg. 875). This policy was designed to help prevent many of the
THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HUNTINGTONS DISEASE IN
MINORS 9 psychological struggles that follow unfortunate diagnoses. Though some have found that a child being tested for such a harmful disease relieves family anxiety, this result is not long lasting. After the immediate feeling of relief and security wears off, other symptoms can manifest, leading personal psychological problems in the child. In conclusion, the evidence that has been found so far on the psychological effects that occur when minors are tested for genetic diseases is still fairly new and limited. Due to the ethical questions it poses, the amount of research that can be done is small. From the studies that have been done, they all seem to agree that genetic testing for Huntington's disease specifically is something that can create a variety of responses, from experiencing symptoms of depression to experiencing a sense of relief about certain test results. Many of these researchers studies were led to conclusions about waiting until individuals are mature enough to decide for themselves before undergoing a predictive test. Further testing still needs to be done to prove that one side is right over the other, however, here are still many stipulations regarding the ethical appeal of predictive genetic testing in general. As more research is being done and more medical advancements are made for these diseases, more questions will be answered and long-term effects on one's psychological wellbeing will become more apparent.
THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HUNTINGTONS DISEASE IN
MINORS 10
THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HUNTINGTONS DISEASE IN