This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding a petition filed by Jimmie Russell under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate a 1931 conviction on the grounds that he did not have legal counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. The court affirmed the district court's denial of the petition, with the district court judge finding based on Russell's testimony and demeanor that he had intelligently waived his right to counsel in 1931 despite his claim. The appellate court affirmed based on the district court judge's opinion.
This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding a petition filed by Jimmie Russell under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate a 1931 conviction on the grounds that he did not have legal counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. The court affirmed the district court's denial of the petition, with the district court judge finding based on Russell's testimony and demeanor that he had intelligently waived his right to counsel in 1931 despite his claim. The appellate court affirmed based on the district court judge's opinion.
This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding a petition filed by Jimmie Russell under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate a 1931 conviction on the grounds that he did not have legal counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. The court affirmed the district court's denial of the petition, with the district court judge finding based on Russell's testimony and demeanor that he had intelligently waived his right to counsel in 1931 despite his claim. The appellate court affirmed based on the district court judge's opinion.
v. Jimmie RUSSELL, Appellant. No. 62. Docket 24122.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued October 4, 1956. Decided October 25, 1956.
Henry K. Chapman, New York City, for appellant.
Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., for Southern Dist. of New York, New York City (Robert Kirkland, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellee. Before FRANK, MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
Appellant petitioned, under 28 U.S.C. 2255, for the vacation of a judgment of
conviction entered in 1931 on his plea of guilty, on the ground that he did not have the assistance of counsel pursuant to the Sixth Amendment. After a hearing on the petition, Judge Weinfeld, who saw and heard the appellant testify, found as a fact that, in 1931, appellant had intelligently waived his right to counsel. D. C., 146 F.Supp. 102, Judge Weinfeld's opinion specifically states that this conclusion was based on his personal impression of appellant's demeanor on the witness stand in addition to the fact of appellant's numerous prior court experiences.
United States of America Ex Rel. Robert Samuel White v. Hon. Edward M. Fay, As Warden of Greenhaven State Prison, Stormville, New York, 349 F.2d 413, 2d Cir. (1965)
United States of America Ex Rel. Anfield Bowers v. Edward M. Fay, Warden, Green Haven Prison and People of The State of New York, 266 F.2d 824, 2d Cir. (1959)
Robert Chandler, an Infant Over Fourteen Years of Age, by Herman Rosenfeld, Guardian Ad Litem, Libellant-Appellant v. United States of America and War Shipping Administration, 185 F.2d 1019, 2d Cir. (1950)