Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Milton Silverman, 439 F.2d 1198, 2d Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States v. Milton Silverman. In the ruling, the three-judge panel amends their previous opinion by deleting a paragraph to avoid any impression that an exception was being made to attorney-client confidential communication rules. However, the panel upholds the admission into evidence of the Friedland report in this case based on the circumstances. The petition for rehearing is denied except as noted regarding the deletion of the paragraph from the previous opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Milton Silverman, 439 F.2d 1198, 2d Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States v. Milton Silverman. In the ruling, the three-judge panel amends their previous opinion by deleting a paragraph to avoid any impression that an exception was being made to attorney-client confidential communication rules. However, the panel upholds the admission into evidence of the Friedland report in this case based on the circumstances. The petition for rehearing is denied except as noted regarding the deletion of the paragraph from the previous opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1970-12-11 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 439 F.2d 1198 Docket: 34392_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States v. Milton Silverman. In the ruling, the three-judge panel amends their previous opinion by deleting a paragraph to avoid any impression that an exception was being made to attorney-client confidential communication rules. However, the panel upholds the admission into evidence of the Friedland report in this case based on the circumstances. The petition for rehearing is denied except as noted regarding the deletion of the paragraph from the previous opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views1 page

    United States v. Milton Silverman, 439 F.2d 1198, 2d Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States v. Milton Silverman. In the ruling, the three-judge panel amends their previous opinion by deleting a paragraph to avoid any impression that an exception was being made to attorney-client confidential communication rules. However, the panel upholds the admission into evidence of the Friedland report in this case based on the circumstances. The petition for rehearing is denied except as noted regarding the deletion of the paragraph from the previous opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    439 F.

    2d 1198

    UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,


    v.
    Milton SILVERMAN, Appellant.
    Nos. 494, 561, Dockets 33584, 34392.

    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.


    Dec. 11, 1970.

    Paul, Weiss, Goldberg, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, by
    Simon H. Rifkind, Edward N. Costikyan and Theodore W. Striggles, New
    York City, of counsel, for appellant.
    Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    Appellant's petition for a rehearing suggests that our opinion makes an


    exception to the attorney-client confidential communication rules. This was not
    the intent of the opinion. To avoid any such impression, the paragraph of the
    decision filed July 1, 1970, reported in 430 F.2d at page 122 and reading 'The
    privilege as commonly formulated * * *' and continuing to the paragraph on
    page 122 (right-hand column) reading 'In view of the position * * *' in the
    opinion reported at 430 F.2d 106, is deleted. However, with respect to the
    Friedland report, we believe that under the circumstances it was properly
    received in evidence.

    We have considered all the other grounds advanced in the petition for
    rehearing, and deny the petition except as noted above.

    You might also like