Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VDA 6.3 Standard Questionnaire en
VDA 6.3 Standard Questionnaire en
disclaimer:
VDA QMC provide you as a participant of a seminar, free of
for use of assessment and reporting of VDA
The use of this excel based reporting i
VDA QMC as well as the designer of this data file do not take over
and proposed classificat
Contract:
Date:
Reason for contract:
Contract issued by (name, dep.):
Auditor:
Auditleader:
Department:
Department:
Supplier-No.:
DUNS-No.:
Supplier/Organization:
Street:
production site (location):
Authorisied person of organization:
Production site (postal code):
Phone:
Fax:
Function: Name:
Top management:
Production management:
Quality management:
Customer support:
Design/Development:
Auditee
0
0
0
0
0
Product group:
First:
Prod.-Gr.-No. (acc. catalog): a
Prod. Titel (acc. catalog):
Second:
b
Third:
c
Fourth:
d
Title: E1 - E10
Process step-No.:
Assessment element
2 two
EU1
EU2
3 three
EU3
4 four
EU4
5 five
EU5
6 six
EU6
1 one
EU7
7 seven
8 eight
Generic baseline
PV
9 nine
ZI
KO
RI
10 ten
Process steps
Product group 1
Product group 2
Product group 3
Product group 4
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
one
two
three
four
five
six
seven
eight
nine
ten
I,
Org.
Department
Quality
Purchasing
Develoment
Name
YX
YC
WW
Process audit
3
4
5
6
7
No.
Question
12
P2
Project management
2.1
14
2.2
15
2.3
16
2.4
2.5
17
0
0
Location:
13
Contcat-No:
Date:
entry text
Weaknesses/recommanded actions, Findings
Generally
*Stars
10
no weakness identified
enty text
enty text
10
no weakness identified
enty text
enty text
18
2.6
19
2.7
20
P3
21
3.1
Are the product and process-specific requirements laid down? n.b. n.b.
enty text
Has manufacturing feasibility been assessed in a crossfunctional manner, based on the requirements which have
been determined for product & process?
n.b. n.b.
enty text
enty text
enty text
3.2
22
23
3.3
3.4
24
3.5
4.2
Are the stipulations arising from the plans for product and
process development put into effect?
Are the personnel resources in place and qualified?
Is the infrastructure in place and appropriate?
Based on the requirements, are the necessary evidence and
releases available for the various phases?
Are the productions control plans used for the various phases
and are production, test and inspection documents derived
from them?
Has a pre-production run been carried out under serial
production conditions to obtain production approval / release?
n.b. n.b.
entry text
n.b. n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b. n.b.
entry text
entry text
entry text
4.6
32
4.7
33
40
5.4
41
5.5
42
5.6
5.7
43
P6
6.1
6.1.1 x
6.1.3
6.1.4
I,
n.b.
entry text
n.b.
entry text
n.b.
entry text
n.b.
entry text
n.b.
entry text
n.b.
n.b.
entry text
entry text
Prozess steps
ten
5.3
entry text
nine
Supplier management
entry text
eight
39
49
entry text
seven
5.2
48
six
38
6.1.2
n.b.
five
5.1
47
n.b.
four
37
46
entry text
three
4.9
P5
45
36
44
n.b.
two
4.8
n.b.
Generally
4.3
4.4
4.5
31
30
35
Process
entry text
Process
Have the Product FMEA / Process FMEA been drawn up? Are n.b. n.b.
they up-dated as the project progresses and are corrective
actions laid down?
Product
4.1
29
34
enty text
27
28
no weakness identified
P4
26
one
25
10
Product
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
4 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. Mixed up parts (part 1 on box, part 2 on label)
8 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. Process weakness (
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
ten
nine
eight
seven
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
6.4.3
66
6.4.4
ten
65
ten
6.4.2 x
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
8 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. Acceptable deviations not defined
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
ten
64
nine
6.4.1
nine
63
nine
Material resources
eight
6.4
eight
62
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
eight
seven
6.3.3
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
seven
61
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
seven
6.3.2 x
six
60
six
6.3.1
six
59
five
6.3
five
58
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
five
6.2.6
four
57
four
6.2.5
four
56
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
three
6.2.4 x
three
55
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
three
6.2.3 x
two
54
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
two
6.2.2
6.5
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
53
67
two
6.2.1 x
52
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
one
6.2
one
51
six
five
6.1.5
four
50
three
two
Question
one
one
No.
68
6.5.1
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
69
6.5.2
Are quality and process data logged in such a way that they
can be assessed?
In the case of deviations from product and process
requirements, are the causes analysed and the corrective
actions checked for effectiveness?
Are processes and products audited regularly?
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
6.5.3 x
70
73
75
6.6.4
77
P7
78
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
79
80
81
82
7.5
83
7.6
84
I,
ten
nine
eight
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
6.6.3
seven
6.6.2
six
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
five
four
6.6.1 x
three
two
6.6
74
76
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
one
72
6.5.4 x
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
Generally
71
10 n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. n.b. no weakness identified
n.b.
entry text
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
entry text
entry text
entry text
n.b.
entry text
n.b.
entry text
0
Location:
Assessmentindex
Process / Product
Overall process P2 to P7
EG
Supl.-No:
Date
Contract
isued by:
ContractNo.:
12/30/1899
###
0
Reason 0
for
contract:
Achieved
Classified
90%
Findings / Requirements:
Product group
EPN
EPN
EPN
EPN
a
b
c
d
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
Date
Carried out
O Yes
O No
Result
Distribution
Participants
---
Auditor:
Auditleader:
0
VDA QMC
Prozessaudit
Overview of results
Assessment elements / Process steps
Contract:
Target
Target
80
90
80
Assessment element/
Process steps
Project management
Planning
Product / Process
Carriying out
Product / Process
level required
[%]
P2
83
P3
P4
70
80
90
100
level required
Assessment
elements
EU1
84
#NAME?
Prozess sequence
EU2
100
#NAME?
Personnel
resources
EU3
100
Material resources
EU4
95
EU5
100
EU6
100
EU7
90
PV
88
n.b
Process analysis
96
P6
#NAME?
60
70
80
90
100
[%]
Process input
Supplier Management P5
Customer satisfaction P7
60
90
Process
effectiveness level
Process
result
Transport/Partshandling/ Storage
one
E1
96
two
E2
n.b.
three
E3
n.b.
four
E4
n.b.
Target orientation
ZI
85
five
E5
n.b.
Communication
KO
87
six
E6
n.b.
Risk orientation
RI
92
seven
E7
n.b.
Overall
compliance
EG
90
eight
E8
n.b.
nine
E9
n.b.
Current audit
ten
E10
n.b.
Previouse audit
Generic baseline
Process
responsibilty
VDA QMC
VDA
A
Development
P2
Project management
.2.1
.2.2*
10
Contract:
.2.3
.2.4
Generic baseline
.2.5*
10
.2.6
.2.7*
10
EPM
83%
G1
G2
G3
PV
ZI
KO
G4
RI
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
Process
.3.2*
.3.3
.3.4
.3.5
.3.1
EPdP
n.b.
.3.2*
.3.3
.3.4
.3.5
EPzP
n.b.
EPP
n.b.
EPP [%] =
EPzR
n.b.
EPR
n.b.
EPR [%] =
ELM
n.b.
EPdP + EPzP
2
Process
.4.2
.4.3
.4.4
.4.5*
4.6.
4.7. 4.8.
4.9.
.4.1
EPdR
.4.2
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
.4.3
.4.4
.4.5*
.4.6
n.b.
.4.7
.4.9
.4.8
EPdR + EPzR
2
Serial production
.5.1*
P5 Supplier management
.5.2
.5.3
.5.4*
.5.5*
.5.6
.5.7
Process step 1:
10
3 Process support
4 Material Ressources
5 Process effectiveness
level
10
Process step 2:
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
.2
.3
.4
.5
10
10
ZI
KO
RI
10
10
10
n.b.
n.b.
n.b
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b
n.b
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
PV
ZI
KO
RI
88%
85%
87%
92%
E10
10
E9
ten
10
E8
nine
10
E7
eight
Process step 9:
10
E6
seven
Process step 8:
10
E5
six
Process step 7:
G4
E4
five
Process step 6:
G3
E3
G2
PV
96%
four
Process step 5:
G1
E2
three
Process step 4:
Generic baseline
10
two
Process stept 3:
E1
one
10
Process step
achievment level
2.1
10
10
.2
10
.3
10
.4
.5
10
.6
10
3.1
10
10
.2
.3
10
10
4.1
10
.2
.3
.4
10
5.1
10
10
.2
10
.3
.4
10
10
6.1
10
.2
10
.3
.4
10
10
6.1.2
EPG
96%
10
10
10
10
10
10
Eu1
84%
Eu2
100%
Eu3
Eu4
100%
.7.1*
Eu5
95%
.7.2
.7.3*
.7.4
.7.5
n.b.
100%
Eu6
Eu7
100%
90%
.7.6
EK
n.b.
n.b.
ED [%] =
EP [%] =
Note: Entry "n.b." = question not assessed
I,
Achievement level:
ED [%]
ELM + EPG + EK
EP[%]
Classified:
83%
96%
B
A
EPM+EPP+EPR+ELM+EPG+EK
6
Classification results (A,B,C) must be entered manually bearing mind the downgrading rules !
Classified:
90%
Prozessaudit
Overview of results
Assessment elements / Process steps
Contract:
Assessment after process analysis (mean
value process step E1-n) and generic baseline
Target
Target
80
90
80
Assessment elements /
Process steps
Product group 1
Product group 2
Product group 3
Product group 4
###
###
###
###
Project management
level required
[%]
83
P3
70
80
90
100
level required
EU1
84
#NAME?
Process sequence
EU2
100
P4
#NAME?
Personnel
resources
EU3
100
Supllier management
P5
n.b
Material resources
EU4
95
Process analysis
P6
96
EU5
100
EU6
100
EU7
90
PV
88
Customer satisfaction P7
#NAME?
Process efficiency
level
Prozess
result /output
Transport / part
handling / Storage
one
E1
96
two
E2
n.b.
three
E3
n.b.
four
E4
n.b.
Target orientation
ZI
85
five
E5
n.b.
Communication
KO
87
six
E6
n.b.
Risk orientation
RI
92
seven
E7
n.b.
Overall
compliance
EG
90
eight
E8
n.b.
nine
E9
n.b.
Current audit
ten
E10
n.b.
Previouse audit
Generic baseline
Process
responsibility
60
70
80
90
100
[%]
Assessment elements
Process input
Planning
Product / Process
Carrying out
Product / Process
P2
60
90
VDA QMC
VDA
A
Development
P2
Project management
.2.1
.2.2*
10
Contract:
.2.3
.2.4
Generic baseline
.2.5*
10
.2.6
.2.7*
10
EPM
83%
G1
G2
G3
PV
ZI
KO
G4
RI
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
Process
.3.2*
.3.3
.3.4
.3.5
.3.1
EPdP
n.b.
.3.2*
.3.3
.3.4
.3.5
EPzP
n.b.
EPP
n.b.
EPP [%] =
EPzR
n.b.
EPR
n.b.
EPR [%] =
ELM
n.b.
EPdP + EPzP
2
Process
.4.2
.4.3
.4.4
.4.5*
4.6.
4.7. 4.8.
4.9.
n.b.
.4.1
n.b.
EPdR
.4.2
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
.4.3
.4.4
.4.5*
.4.6
.4.7
.4.9
.4.8
n.b.
EPdR + EPzR
2
Serial production
.5.1*
P5 Supplier management
n.b.
.5.2
.5.3
.5.4*
.5.5*
.5.6
.5.7
Process step 1:
10
3 Process support
4 Material resources
6.5.4*
Process step
achievement level
10
Process step 2:
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
96%
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
.2
10
.3
.4
.5
10
10
ZI
KO
RI
10
10
10
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
PV
ZI
KO
RI
88%
85%
87%
92%
E10
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b. n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
10
E9
ten
10
E8
nine
10
E7
eight
Process step 9:
10
E6
seven
Process stept 8:
10
E5
six
Process step 7:
G4
E4
five
Process step 6:
G3
E3
four
Process step 5:
G2
E2
three
Process step 4:
G1
PV
10
two
Process step 3:
Generic baseline
E1
one
10
2.1
10
.2
10
10
.3
.4
10
.5
10
.6
10
3.1
10
10
.2
.3
10
10
4.1
10
.2
.3
.4
10
5.1
10
10
.2
10
.3
.4
10
10
6.1
10
.2
10
.3
.4
10
6.1.2
EPG
10
96%
10
10
10
10
10
10
Transport Teilehandling:
Eu1
Eu2
84%
Eu3
100%
Eu4
100%
.7.1*
Eu5
95%
.7.2
.7.3*
.7.4
.7.5
100%
Eu6
Eu7
100%
90%
.7.6
EK
n.b.
Achievement level EPG per product group element P6 [%] (mean value Ex - En)
Product group
Process steps
EPGN [%]
n.b.
n.b.
ED [%] =
EP [%] =
Note: Entry "n.b." = question not assessed
I,
n.b.
n.b.
Achievement level:
ED [%]
EP[%]
Classified:
83%
96%
B
A
Prod. Group
EPN [%]
Classified
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
n.b.
EPM+EPP+EPR+ELM+EPG+EK
6
Classification results (A,B,C) must be entered manually bearing mind the downgrading rules !
Classified:
90%
Prozessaudit
Comments
Contract: VA
The improvement program will be presented at the day of visit during the closing meeting and hand over as a pre copy of the report. The audited organization is
required to create effective actions to close the identified weaknesses and put them into operational prastice.
We point out, that in this audits the processes are only verified by conducted sample inspections are conducted. It is the responsibility of the audited organization
(departements) to further investigate and create and spread actions for similiar issues.
Participants:
Organization:
I,
0 0
0 0
0
Auditor:
Auditor:
Prozessaudit
QTP 11/19
Supplier -No: 0
Contract:
VA
Timing Supplier
Activities
Improvement program received
Timing
12/30/1899
1/13/1900
II. Realization of the improvement program incl. Confirmation and timing of self assessment ( 12 weeks )
4/13/1900
III. Selfassessment according to VDA 6.3 ( 10 week ) ( by classification "B" or "C" only )
6/22/1900
Comments
The activities must be realized immedeatelly. For large imprvement programs the realization can be subdivided in several realization phases.
Selfassessment: to assess seriously the selfassessment, we ask for information about the audit timing (man days) and the qualitfication of the
auditors used. In our opinion the audit timing equates a timing of a certification audit. After receiving and verifying the audit documents we will,
if the result is classified as "A", agree our next audit timing. If trhe result is classified as "B" we ask for realistic timing you will achieve an "A"
classification. We expect then the ontime sending of the audit report of the internals follow up audit, without any specific request from us.
Suppliert Mgmt.
I,
Auditor:
Prozessaudit
Improvement plan
Supplier:
Location:
0
0
Contract-No.:
Date:
I,
Question
No.
Points
Pos.
to be completed ba auditor
P2
Project management
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
#REF!
no weakness identified
enty text
enty text
no weakness identified
enty text
enty text
no weakness identified
P3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
enty text
enty text
enty text
enty text
enty text
#REF!
Timing
Responsibili
ty
Effectivenes
Prozessaudit
Improvement plan
Supplier:
Location:
0
0
Contract-No.:
Date:
I,
Question
No.
Pos.
to be completed ba auditor
P4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
entry text
entry text
entry text
entry text
entry text
entry text
entry text
entry text
P5
Supplier management
5.1
5.2
5.3
entry text
entry text
entry text
Timing
Responsibili
ty
Effectivenes
Prozessaudit
Improvement plan
Supplier:
Location:
0
0
Contract-No.:
Date:
I,
Question
No.
Pos.
to be completed ba auditor
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
entry text
entry text
entry text
entry text
P6
6.1
6.1.1
6.1.2
6.1.3
6.1.4
6.1.5
6.2
6.2.1
6.2.2
Timing
Responsibili
ty
Effectivenes
Prozessaudit
Improvement plan
Supplier:
Location:
0
0
Contract-No.:
Date:
I,
Question
No.
Pos.
to be completed ba auditor
6.2.3
6.2.4
6.2.5
6.2.6
6.3
6.3.1
6.3.2
6.3.3
6.4
6.4.1
6.4.2
6.4.3
6.4.4
6.5
6.5.1
6.5.2
6.5.3
6.5.4
6.6
6.6.1
6.6.2
6.6.3
6.6.4
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
Process support / Personell resources
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
Material resources
no weakness identified
Acceptable deviations not defined
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
Process effectiveness (integrate effectivness, efficiency and elimination of waste)
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
What should the process produce ? Process result (output)
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
no weakness identified
P7
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
entry text
entry text
entry text
entry text
Timing
Responsibili
ty
Effectivenes
Prozessaudit
Improvement plan
Supplier:
Location:
0
0
Contract-No.:
Date:
Question
No.
7.5
7.6
I,
Pos.
to be completed ba auditor
Timing
Responsibili
ty
Effectivenes
Prozessaudit
Sofortm. 17/19
Contract-No.:
Date:
Question
P2
Project management
P6
6.1
6.2
I,
Weaknesses / recommended
activities, Finding
Pos.
Assessment of the
realization at
production site (in
%)
Timing
Responsibility
Comments
Prozessaudit
Sofortm. 18/19
Contract-No.:
Date:
I,
Question
Weaknesses / recommended
activities, Finding
6.3
6.5
Pos.
Assessment of the
realization at
production site (in
%)
Timing
Responsibility
Comments
Prozessaudit
Sofortm. 19/19
Supplier:
Location:
Contract-No.:
Date:
Question
P7
Weaknesses / recommended
activities, Finding
Pos.
Assessment of the
realization at
production site (in
%)
Timing
Responsibility
Comments
Signatures:
Date
I,
Production Mgmt.
Quality Mgmt.