1) The petitioner sought recognition for tax purposes of a partnership between himself and his wife as the sole partners.
2) The Tax Court denied recognition of the partnership and redetermined deficiencies in the petitioner's income taxes for 1943, 1944 and 1945.
3) The Court of Appeals affirmed the Tax Court's decisions on the authority of an earlier case that set a precedent for denying recognition of partnerships between spouses for tax purposes.
1) The petitioner sought recognition for tax purposes of a partnership between himself and his wife as the sole partners.
2) The Tax Court denied recognition of the partnership and redetermined deficiencies in the petitioner's income taxes for 1943, 1944 and 1945.
3) The Court of Appeals affirmed the Tax Court's decisions on the authority of an earlier case that set a precedent for denying recognition of partnerships between spouses for tax purposes.
1) The petitioner sought recognition for tax purposes of a partnership between himself and his wife as the sole partners.
2) The Tax Court denied recognition of the partnership and redetermined deficiencies in the petitioner's income taxes for 1943, 1944 and 1945.
3) The Court of Appeals affirmed the Tax Court's decisions on the authority of an earlier case that set a precedent for denying recognition of partnerships between spouses for tax purposes.
v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 122. No. 123. Docket 21756. Docket 21757.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued January 10, 1951. Decided January 24, 1951.
Petitions to review two decisions of the Tax Court consolidated for
hearing, redetermining deficiencies in the income taxes of the petitioner for the years 1943, 1944 and 1945. The petitioner sought, and was denied, recognition for tax purposes of a partnership in which he and his wife were the sole partners. Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, New York City, H. Maurice Fridlund, Earl Q. Kullman, New York City, William A. Sheehan, Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel, for petitioner. Charles Oliphant, Washington, D. C., Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Robert N. Anderson, and Louise Foster, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent. Before CHASE, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
Decisions affirmed on the authority of Morrison v. Commissioner of Internal
Robert Chandler, an Infant Over Fourteen Years of Age, by Herman Rosenfeld, Guardian Ad Litem, Libellant-Appellant v. United States of America and War Shipping Administration, 185 F.2d 1019, 2d Cir. (1950)
Gardens of Faith, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Raymond F. Cushing and Kathryne R. Cushing v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 345 F.2d 180, 4th Cir. (1965)
United States v. Enrique Alfonso Gayle, A/K/A Kiki, United States of America v. Lino H. Haynes, A/K/A Loni Haynes, A/K/A Nino, United States of America v. Roberto Spalding, A/K/A Pepito, A/K/A Pops, United States of America v. Cleveland McLean Jr., A/K/A Junior, A/K/A June, United States of America v. Franklyn Earl Bannerman, United States of America v. Timothy Steven Boyd, A/K/A Tim, United States of America v. Carol Richardson, A/K/A Carol Ann Preston, A/K/A Sharon Thomas, A/K/A Lakeisha Perry, A/K/A Lakeisha Knight, 974 F.2d 1332, 4th Cir. (1992)
Louis J. Ferris and Jean H. Ferris v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Louis J. Ferris v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 317 F.2d 333, 2d Cir. (1963)
Intercontinental Transportation Co., Inc., Owner of The S.S. Natalie v. States Marine Lines, Inc., and Arrow Steamship Co., Inc., 297 F.2d 249, 2d Cir. (1961)
Chemical Bank & Trust Company, As of Siegfried Kahn, Deceased v. Rea Forhan Pedrick, As Administratrix of William J. Pedrick, Deceased, 185 F.2d 1022, 2d Cir. (1951)
Robert E. Miller v. Carl Weller, Emily I. Weller, Everett Weller, Ray Weller, Mamie Weller, Norman E. Ritter and Marjorie Hester, Formerly Trading as Weller Manufacturing Co., 286 F.2d 172, 3rd Cir. (1961)
Estate of Leon N. F. Blanchard, Deceased, Wallace H. Blanchard and Annie B. Blanchard, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 184 F.2d 438, 3rd Cir. (1950)