Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Jonathan Holdeen v. Riley J. Ratterree, As District Director of Internal Revenue, 253 F.2d 428, 2d Cir. (1958)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jonathan Holdeen appealed the dismissal of his complaint seeking an injunction against the collection of income tax deficiencies for the years 1945-1950 assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court for the Northern District of New York dismissing Holdeen's complaint, agreeing with the district court's opinion that an injunction against the tax collection was not warranted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Jonathan Holdeen v. Riley J. Ratterree, As District Director of Internal Revenue, 253 F.2d 428, 2d Cir. (1958)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    Jonathan Holdeen appealed the dismissal of his complaint seeking an injunction against the collection of income tax deficiencies for the years 1945-1950 assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court for the Northern District of New York dismissing Holdeen's complaint, agreeing with the district court's opinion that an injunction against the tax collection was not warranted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1958-04-07 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 253 F.2d 428 Docket: 24885

    Original Title

    Jonathan Holdeen v. Riley J. Ratterree, as District Director of Internal Revenue, 253 F.2d 428, 2d Cir. (1958)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jonathan Holdeen appealed the dismissal of his complaint seeking an injunction against the collection of income tax deficiencies for the years 1945-1950 assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court for the Northern District of New York dismissing Holdeen's complaint, agreeing with the district court's opinion that an injunction against the tax collection was not warranted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views1 page

    Jonathan Holdeen v. Riley J. Ratterree, As District Director of Internal Revenue, 253 F.2d 428, 2d Cir. (1958)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jonathan Holdeen appealed the dismissal of his complaint seeking an injunction against the collection of income tax deficiencies for the years 1945-1950 assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court for the Northern District of New York dismissing Holdeen's complaint, agreeing with the district court's opinion that an injunction against the tax collection was not warranted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    253 F.

    2d 428

    Jonathan HOLDEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Riley J. RATTERREE, as District Director of Internal
    Revenue, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 228.
    Docket 24885.

    United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.


    Argued March 11, 1958.
    Decided April 7, 1958.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of
    New York; Stephen W. Brennan, Judge.
    Jonathan Holdeen appeals from the dismissal of his complaint seeking an
    injunction against the collection of deficiencies in income taxes for the
    years 1945-1950 assessed against him by the Commissioner of Internal
    Revenue.
    Jonathan Holdeen, Pine Plains, N. Y., plaintiff-appellant, pro se.
    Louise Foster, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Charles K.
    Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Melva M. Graney, Attys.,
    Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Theodore F. Bowes, U. S. Atty.,
    N.D.N.Y., Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
    Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and HINCKS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    Affirmed on the opinion and decision of District Judge Brennan, D.C.N.D.N.


    Y., 155 F.Supp. 509.

    You might also like