Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 3

PP 7767/09/2010(025354)

Economic Highlights
Global

MARKET DATELINE

27 May 2010

1 Lenders Are Becoming More Reluctant To Lend To


European Banks But Likely To Be Manageable

2 US Home Sales And Durable Goods New Orders Picked


Up In April

3 Singapore’s Industrial Production Picked Up In April

Tracking The World Economy...

Today’s Highlight

Lenders Are Becoming More Reluctant To Lend To European Banks But Likely To Be Manageable

Lenders to the major European banks are becoming increasingly cautious, demanding higher rates for shorter- period
loans, risking a repeat of the credit crunch that gripped credit markets in 2008 following the collapse of Lehman Brothers,
if left uncheck. The rate banks paid for 3-month US dollar loans climbed for the 12th consecutive day, as concerns over
Europe’s sovereign debt crisis is making banks wary of lending to each other. The London interbank offered rate, or
Libor, for such loans advanced to 0.538%, the highest level since July 6. Indeed, Spain’s Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria
(BBVA) has been unable to renew roughly US$1bn of short-term funding in the US commercial-paper market since the
beginning of the month. Also, Spain’s two largest banks, Banco Santander and BBVA, recently boosted the amount of
funds they parked it overnight with the European Central Bank (ECB), indicating that they preferred risk-free return rather
than lend it to competitors. Similarly, the US dollar Libor-Overnight Indexed Swaps (OIS) spread, a gauge of banks’
reluctance to lend rose to 31.5 basis points on 26 April, from 8.6 basis points at end-December 2009. Nevertheless,
it was still far lower than the peak of 365.9 basis points spread recorded on 10 October 2008 during the US credit crisis.
The OIS tracks the expected path of the Fed’s benchmark Federal funds rate. Despite the deterioration in confidence,
it has yet to reach a panicky stage, as indicated by the US dollar Libor-OIS spread. Indeed, the Euroland governments
could provide some form of guarantees to calm down the situation like what the US Treasury did during the credit crisis.
Also, the US Federal Reserve could provide help by lowering the interest rate it charges on US dollar loans it makes
through the ECB to US dollar-starved commercial banks in Europe.

The US Economy

New And Existing Home Sales Grew In April

◆ US new home sales rose by 14.8% mom to an annual pace of 504,000 units in April, albeit at a more
moderate pace compared with +29.9% in March. This was the second month of increase in six months, as buyers
were attracted by lower prices and they rushed to qualify for a government tax incentive. Recall that the
government offered homebuyer incentive worth as much as US$8,000 for contracts closed by the end of June and
the incentive is broadened to include more affluent buyers. A gradual improvement in job market also helped to
boost sales. Meanwhile, median prices of new homes fell by 9.7% mom in April, after remaining unchanged in
March, indicating that developers cut prices to attract buyers. Compared to a year ago, median prices of new
homes fell by 9.5% yoy in April, the sharpest drop in nine months and compared with +7.1% in March. Yoy, new
home sales strengthened to 46.1% in April, from +32.2% in March. This was the third month of increase in four

Peck Boon Soon


(603) 9280 2163
Please read important disclosures at the end of this report.
bspeck@rhb.com.my

Page 1 of 3
A comprehensive range of market research reports by award-winning economists and analysts are
exclusively available for download from www.rhbinvest.com
27 May 2010

months, suggesting that the housing sector is improving, albeit uneven. The pick-up in new home sales pushed
down the supply of new homes for sales to 5.0 months of stocks in April, from 6.2 months of stocks in March and
a high of 8.2 months of stocks in February.

◆ US existing home sales grew at a faster pace of 7.6% mom or at an annual rate of 5.77 million units
in April, compared with +7.0% in March. This was the second month of increase in five months, as buyers took
advantage of a government tax credit incentive. Yoy, the existing home sales grew at a stronger pace of 22.8%
in April, compared with +16.3% in March. Despite the pick-up in existing home sales, the supply of new homes
for sales rose to 8.4 months of stocks in April, from 8.1 months of stocks in March. Meanwhile, the median existing
home prices inched up by 2.1% mom in April, after rising by 3.0% in March. Yoy, the median prices of existing
homes rose by 4.0%, a rebound from -0.2% during the same period. As a whole, the pick-up in both new and
existing home sales in March-April suggests that the government’s tax incentive has yielded positive results and
the government is hoping that a recovery in economy and employment will help sustain housing demand in 2H
2010 when the tax incentive lapses.

Durable Goods New Orders Picked Up Mom In April

◆ US durable goods new orders, items meant to last at least three years, rose by 2.9% mom in April, after
remaining unchanged in March and compared with +0.5% in February, mainly driven by a pick-up in orders for
non-defence aircraft (which is lumpy and often volatile). A slowdown in new orders for fabricated metals,
computers & electronic products and automobiles as well as declines in orders for primary metals, machinery and
electrical equipment, however, offset part of the gain. Excluding transportation, durable goods new orders contracted
by 1.0% mom in April, after rising by 4.8% in March and +2.1% in February. Similarly, new orders for capital
goods, excluding defence goods and aircraft, fell by 2.4% mom in April, compared with +6.5% in March,
suggesting that businesses have turned cautious in spending. Yoy, total new orders for durable goods
strengthened to 21.6% in April, the fourth consecutive month of increase and after picking up to 16.3% in March.
New orders for capital goods, excluding defence goods and aircraft, strengthened to 23.5% yoy in April, the fifth
consecutive month of increase and from +18.7% in March, suggesting that business spending is improving. As
a whole, April’s durable goods new orders suggest that manufacturing activities are likely to improve in the
months ahead.

Asian Economies

Singapore’s Industrial Production Picked Up In April

◆ Singapore’s industrial production strengthened to 51.0% yoy in April, from +43.0% in March, after
slowing down to +17.9% in February, as factories resumed their production after the festive break. This was the
fifth straight month of growth due partly to a low base effect. Stronger growth was reflected in a pick-up in the
production of biomedical products, which grew at a faster pace of 95.8% yoy in April, compared with +66.4% in
March, on account of a pick-up in the production of pharmaceutical products. This was, however, offset partially
by a slowdown in the production of electronic products, which eased to 60.0% yoy in April, but remained strong
compared with +76.9% in March. The moderation was due to a slowdown in the production of semiconductors,
computer peripherals, data storage products, information & communication and consumer electronic products.
Mom, industrial production rebounded to increase at a seasonally adjusted rate of 24.3% in April, from -
0.8% in March. This suggests that Singapore’s economy will continue to expand in the 2Q, after at an annualised
rate of +38.6% in the 1Q.

A comprehensive range of market research reports by award-winning economists and analysts are Page 2 of 3
exclusively available for download from www.rhbinvest.com
27 May 2010

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

This report has been prepared by RHB Research Institute Sdn Bhd (RHBRI) and is for private circulation only to clients of RHBRI
and RHB Investment Bank Berhad (previously known as RHB Sakura Merchant Bankers Berhad). It is for distribution only under
such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law. The opinions and information contained herein are based on
generally available data believed to be reliable and are subject to change without notice, and may differ or be contrary to
opinions expressed by other business units within the RHB Group as a result of using different assumptions and criteria. This
report is not to be construed as an offer, invitation or solicitation to buy or sell the securities covered herein. RHBRI does not
warrant the accuracy of anything stated herein in any manner whatsoever and no reliance upon such statement by anyone shall
give rise to any claim whatsoever against RHBRI. RHBRI and/or its associated persons may from time to time have an interest
in the securities mentioned by this report.

This report does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without regard to the individual
financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. The securities discussed in this report may not be suitable for
all investors. RHBRI recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages
investors to seek the advice of a financial adviser. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an
investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. Neither RHBRI, RHB Group nor any of its affiliates, employees or agents
accepts any liability for any loss or damage arising out of the use of all or any part of this report.

RHBRI and the Connected Persons (the “RHB Group”) are engaged in securities trading, securities brokerage, banking and
financing activities as well as providing investment banking and financial advisory services. In the ordinary course of its trading,
brokerage, banking and financing activities, any member of the RHB Group may at any time hold positions, and may trade or
otherwise effect transactions, for its own account or the accounts of customers, in debt or equity securities or loans of any
company that may be involved in this transaction.

“Connected Persons” means any holding company of RHBRI, the subsidiaries and subsidiary undertaking of such a holding
company and the respective directors, officers, employees and agents of each of them. Investors should assume that the
“Connected Persons” are seeking or will seek investment banking or other services from the companies in which the securities
have been discussed/covered by RHBRI in this report or in RHBRI’s previous reports.

This report has been prepared by the research personnel of RHBRI. Facts and views presented in this report have not been
reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other business areas of the “Connected Persons,”
including investment banking personnel.

The research analysts, economists or research associates principally responsible for the preparation of this research report have
received compensation based upon various factors, including quality of research, investor client feedback, stock picking, competitive
factors and firm revenues.

A comprehensive range of market research reports by award-winning economists and analysts are Page 3 of 3
exclusively available for download from www.rhbinvest.com

You might also like