Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Paul C. Harshman, in No. 15352, Glenn R. Jacobs, in No. 15353, Beryl D. Ward, in No. 15354 v. Well Service, Incorporated, 355 F.2d 206, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Three employees appealed a district court ruling in favor of their employer, Well Service Incorporated, in a case regarding overtime pay. The appeals court found no errors in the district court's decision. It affirmed the lower court's ruling for the employer for the reasons provided in Judge Marsh's opinion, which found that the employees were exempt from overtime protections under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The appeals court decision was brief, simply stating it found no errors after reviewing the record and agreeing with the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Paul C. Harshman, in No. 15352, Glenn R. Jacobs, in No. 15353, Beryl D. Ward, in No. 15354 v. Well Service, Incorporated, 355 F.2d 206, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    Three employees appealed a district court ruling in favor of their employer, Well Service Incorporated, in a case regarding overtime pay. The appeals court found no errors in the district court's decision. It affirmed the lower court's ruling for the employer for the reasons provided in Judge Marsh's opinion, which found that the employees were exempt from overtime protections under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The appeals court decision was brief, simply stating it found no errors after reviewing the record and agreeing with the lower court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1965-12-17 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 355 F.2d 206 Docket: 15352-15354

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Three employees appealed a district court ruling in favor of their employer, Well Service Incorporated, in a case regarding overtime pay. The appeals court found no errors in the district court's decision. It affirmed the lower court's ruling for the employer for the reasons provided in Judge Marsh's opinion, which found that the employees were exempt from overtime protections under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The appeals court decision was brief, simply stating it found no errors after reviewing the record and agreeing with the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views1 page

    Paul C. Harshman, in No. 15352, Glenn R. Jacobs, in No. 15353, Beryl D. Ward, in No. 15354 v. Well Service, Incorporated, 355 F.2d 206, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Three employees appealed a district court ruling in favor of their employer, Well Service Incorporated, in a case regarding overtime pay. The appeals court found no errors in the district court's decision. It affirmed the lower court's ruling for the employer for the reasons provided in Judge Marsh's opinion, which found that the employees were exempt from overtime protections under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The appeals court decision was brief, simply stating it found no errors after reviewing the record and agreeing with the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    355 F.

    2d 206

    Paul C. HARSHMAN, Appellant in No. 15352, Glenn R.


    Jacobs,
    Appellant in No. 15353, Beryl D. Ward, Appellant
    in No. 15354,
    v.
    WELL SERVICE, INCORPORATED.
    Nos. 15352-15354.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued Dec. 6, 1965.
    Decided Dec. 17, 1965.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Pennsylvania; Rabe Ferguson Marsh, Jr., Judge.
    Charles R. Volk, Pittsburgh, Pa., James Hook, Waynesburg, Pa. (Thorp,
    Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.
    Paul N. Bowles, Charleston, W. Va. (Stone, Mauzy, Bowles & Kauffelt,
    Charleston, W. Va., Fred C. Houston, Jr., Houston, Houston & Donnelly,
    Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
    Before KALODNER, Chief Judge, and MARIS and FORMAN, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court will
    be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in the opinion of Judge Marsh, 248
    F.Supp. 953.

    You might also like