Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • J. Richard Sabo and Francis M. Pallone v. Borough of Indiana and Redevelopment Authority of The County of Indiana, 389 F.2d 388, 3rd Cir. (1968)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from 1968 in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court finding that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint. The case involved appellants J. Richard Sabo and Francis M. Pallone against the Borough of Indiana and Redevelopment Authority of Indiana County. The per curiam opinion by the circuit court found no grounds in the complaint that would give the district court jurisdiction over the subject matter.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1968-02-16 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 389 F.2d 388 Docket: 16817_1

    Original Title

    J. Richard Sabo and Francis M. Pallone v. Borough of Indiana and Redevelopment Authority of the County of Indiana, 389 F.2d 388, 3rd Cir. (1968)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from 1968 in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court finding that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint. The case involved appellants J. Richard Sabo and Francis M. Pallone against the Borough of Indiana and Redevelopment Authority of Indiana County. The per curiam opinion by the circuit court found no grounds in the complaint that would give the district court jurisdiction over the subject matter.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    J. Richard Sabo and Francis M. Pallone v. Borough of Indiana and Redevelopment Authority of The County of Indiana, 389 F.2d 388, 3rd Cir. (1968)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from 1968 in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court finding that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint. The case involved appellants J. Richard Sabo and Francis M. Pallone against the Borough of Indiana and Redevelopment Authority of Indiana County. The per curiam opinion by the circuit court found no grounds in the complaint that would give the district court jurisdiction over the subject matter.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    389 F.

    2d 388

    J. Richard SABO and Francis M. Pallone, Appellants,


    v.
    BOROUGH OF INDIANA and Redevelopment Authority of
    the County of Indiana.
    No. 16817.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued January 9, 1968.
    Decided February 16, 1968.

    Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of
    Pennsylvania, Rabe Ferguson Marsh, Jr., Judge.

    James W. Mack, Jr., Indiana, Pa., for appellants.

    W. Parker Ruddock, Fisher, Ruddock & Simpson, Indiana, Pa., for appellee
    Borough of Indiana.

    Robert C. Earley, Handler, Malcolm & Earley, Indiana, Pa., for appellee
    Redevelopment Authority.

    Alexander Unkovic, Meyer, Unkovic & Scott, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief, for
    appellees.

    Before McLAUGHLIN, FREEDMAN and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.

    OPINION OF THE COURT


    6

    PER CURIAM.

    From our independent study of the complaint in this appeal, we find no basis
    set out therein which would give jurisdiction to the District Court of the subject
    matter thereof.

    The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

    You might also like