Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Santa Marco and Ernest Marco, Her Husband, and Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco, Her Husband v. Francis J. Perry, Jr. and Francis J. Perry, SR, 351 F.2d 953, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It involves an appeal of a motor vehicle collision case where Santa Marco, Ernest Marco, Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco sued Francis J. Perry Jr. and Francis J. Perry Sr. The only substantial questions presented to the appeals court were whether the original verdicts were contrary to the weight of the evidence or law. The appeals court found that the verdicts were not contrary and affirmed the original judgments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Santa Marco and Ernest Marco, Her Husband, and Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco, Her Husband v. Francis J. Perry, Jr. and Francis J. Perry, SR, 351 F.2d 953, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It involves an appeal of a motor vehicle collision case where Santa Marco, Ernest Marco, Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco sued Francis J. Perry Jr. and Francis J. Perry Sr. The only substantial questions presented to the appeals court were whether the original verdicts were contrary to the weight of the evidence or law. The appeals court found that the verdicts were not contrary and affirmed the original judgments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1965-11-12 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 351 F.2d 953 Docket: 15138_1

    Original Title

    Santa Marco and Ernest Marco, Her Husband, and Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco, Her Husband v. Francis J. Perry, Jr. And Francis J. Perry, Sr, 351 F.2d 953, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It involves an appeal of a motor vehicle collision case where Santa Marco, Ernest Marco, Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco sued Francis J. Perry Jr. and Francis J. Perry Sr. The only substantial questions presented to the appeals court were whether the original verdicts were contrary to the weight of the evidence or law. The appeals court found that the verdicts were not contrary and affirmed the original judgments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    18 views1 page

    Santa Marco and Ernest Marco, Her Husband, and Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco, Her Husband v. Francis J. Perry, Jr. and Francis J. Perry, SR, 351 F.2d 953, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It involves an appeal of a motor vehicle collision case where Santa Marco, Ernest Marco, Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco sued Francis J. Perry Jr. and Francis J. Perry Sr. The only substantial questions presented to the appeals court were whether the original verdicts were contrary to the weight of the evidence or law. The appeals court found that the verdicts were not contrary and affirmed the original judgments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    351 F.

    2d 953

    Santa MARCO and Ernest Marco, Her Husband, and


    Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco, Her Husband,
    Appellants,
    v.
    Francis J. PERRY, Jr. and Francis J. Perry, Sr.
    No. 15138.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued September 17, 1965.
    Decided November 12, 1965.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New
    Jersey; Thomas M. Madden, Judge.
    John F. Dougherty, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Bellis, Kolsby & Poplow,
    Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
    William S. Zink, Camden, N. J. (Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink, Camden, N.
    J., on the brief), for appellee Francis J. Perry, Jr.
    Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and KALODNER, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    This case arises out of a collision between motor vehicles and the only
    substantial questions presented are whether or not the verdicts were contrary to
    the weight of the evidence or to the law. We are convinced that they were not.
    Though the amounts of damages allowed to the plaintiffs are asserted to be
    inadequate and to represent compromises by the jury, we are not convinced of
    this. Consequently, the judgments will be affirmed.

    You might also like