Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • June D. Peterson v. William J. Cox, and Carl Hansen, Ind. & T/a Transport Helicopters, Inc, 422 F.2d 401, 3rd Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It affirms the district court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff, June D. Peterson, against the defendant William J. Cox. The defendant Cox argued that the district court's fact-findings were clearly erroneous and that it applied incorrect legal standards. However, the Court of Appeals found no clear errors in the fact-findings or legal errors after reviewing the record. Therefore, it affirmed the district court's order of judgment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1970-03-31 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 422 F.2d 401 Docket: 17987

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It affirms the district court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff, June D. Peterson, against the defendant William J. Cox. The defendant Cox argued that the district court's fact-findings were clearly erroneous and that it applied incorrect legal standards. However, the Court of Appeals found no clear errors in the fact-findings or legal errors after reviewing the record. Therefore, it affirmed the district court's order of judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    June D. Peterson v. William J. Cox, and Carl Hansen, Ind. & T/a Transport Helicopters, Inc, 422 F.2d 401, 3rd Cir. (1970)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It affirms the district court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff, June D. Peterson, against the defendant William J. Cox. The defendant Cox argued that the district court's fact-findings were clearly erroneous and that it applied incorrect legal standards. However, the Court of Appeals found no clear errors in the fact-findings or legal errors after reviewing the record. Therefore, it affirmed the district court's order of judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    422 F.

    2d 401

    June D. PETERSON
    v.
    William J. COX, Appellant, and
    Carl Hansen, Ind. & t/a Transport Helicopters, Inc.
    No. 17987.

    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.


    Argued on February 17, 1970.
    Decided on March 31, 1970.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Pennsylvania; Charles R. Weiner, Judge.

    Robert W. Sayre, Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul, Philadelphia, Pa. (Joseph D.
    Calhoun, Media, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

    Rames J. Bucci, Bucci & Bucci, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

    Before KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges, and FULLAM,


    District Judge.

    OPINION OF THE COURT


    4

    PER CURIAM.

    On this appeal the defendant Cox contends that the fact-findings made by the
    District Court in this non-jury trial are "clearly erroneous", and that the District
    Court applied erroneous legal standards in its disposition.

    On review of the record we cannot say that the challenged fact-findings are
    "clearly erroneous", or that the District Court erred as a matter of law in
    entering judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Cox.

    The Order of Judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

    You might also like