Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States of America, Ex Rel. Patsy Pillo v. William F. Parker, Sheriff, Burlington County, and Dr. Lloyd W. McCorkle Warden, New Jersey State Penitentiary, 217 F.2d 311, 3rd Cir. (1954)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    23 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the lower district court in denying a writ of habeas corpus to appellant Patsy Pillo. The appeals court found that the courts of New Jersey did not deny Pillo due process of law after examining the briefs, record, and oral arguments. The per curiam opinion was issued on December 9, 1954 affirming the lower court's ruling that Pillo's detention was lawful.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1954-12-09 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 217 F.2d 311 Docket: 11470_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the lower district court in denying a writ of habeas corpus to appellant Patsy Pillo. The appeals court found that the courts of New Jersey did not deny Pillo due process of law after examining the briefs, record, and oral arguments. The per curiam opinion was issued on December 9, 1954 affirming the lower court's ruling that Pillo's detention was lawful.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    23 views1 page

    United States of America, Ex Rel. Patsy Pillo v. William F. Parker, Sheriff, Burlington County, and Dr. Lloyd W. McCorkle Warden, New Jersey State Penitentiary, 217 F.2d 311, 3rd Cir. (1954)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the lower district court in denying a writ of habeas corpus to appellant Patsy Pillo. The appeals court found that the courts of New Jersey did not deny Pillo due process of law after examining the briefs, record, and oral arguments. The per curiam opinion was issued on December 9, 1954 affirming the lower court's ruling that Pillo's detention was lawful.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    217 F.

    2d 311

    UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Patsy PILLO, Appellant,


    v.
    William F. PARKER, Sheriff, Burlington County, and Dr.
    Lloyd W. McCorkle, Warden, New Jersey State Penitentiary.
    No. 11470.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued December 7, 1954.
    Decided December 9, 1954.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New
    Jersey; Phillip Forman, Judge.
    Joseph Tomaselli, Camden, N. J., for appellant.
    Harold Kolovsky, Trenton, N. J., for appellees.
    Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN,
    KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    An examination of the briefs and record and consideration of the oral


    arguments in this case convinces us that there has been no denial of due process
    of law to the appellant, Pillo, by the Courts of New Jersey.

    Accordingly, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

    You might also like