Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In The Matter of Ernest Paul and Emil Paul, Individually and Trading As Philadelphia China Company, Bankrupts, William T. Gennetti, Trustee, 351 F.2d 311, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the order of the district court granting a discharge to Emil Paul in bankruptcy proceedings. The referee in bankruptcy reasonably concluded that Emil Paul was not a knowing participant in providing a false financial statement or statement of affairs. The Court of Appeals agreed with the district court's affirmation of the referee's order granting discharge to Emil Paul, which was the only portion of the district court's order subject to appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1965-10-22 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 351 F.2d 311 Docket: 15257_1

    Original Title

    In the Matter of Ernest Paul and Emil Paul, Individually and Trading as Philadelphia China Company, Bankrupts, William T. Gennetti, Trustee, 351 F.2d 311, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the order of the district court granting a discharge to Emil Paul in bankruptcy proceedings. The referee in bankruptcy reasonably concluded that Emil Paul was not a knowing participant in providing a false financial statement or statement of affairs. The Court of Appeals agreed with the district court's affirmation of the referee's order granting discharge to Emil Paul, which was the only portion of the district court's order subject to appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views1 page

    In The Matter of Ernest Paul and Emil Paul, Individually and Trading As Philadelphia China Company, Bankrupts, William T. Gennetti, Trustee, 351 F.2d 311, 3rd Cir. (1965)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the order of the district court granting a discharge to Emil Paul in bankruptcy proceedings. The referee in bankruptcy reasonably concluded that Emil Paul was not a knowing participant in providing a false financial statement or statement of affairs. The Court of Appeals agreed with the district court's affirmation of the referee's order granting discharge to Emil Paul, which was the only portion of the district court's order subject to appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    351 F.

    2d 311

    In the Matter of Ernest PAUL and Emil Paul, Individually and


    Trading as Philadelphia China Company, Bankrupts,
    William T. Gennetti, Trustee, Appellant.
    No. 15257.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued Sept. 24, 1965.
    Decided Oct. 22, 1965.

    M. E. Maurer, Philadelphia, Pa. (Wexler, Mulder & Weisman and Herman


    N. Silver, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
    Sidney Chait, Philadelphia, Pa. (Adelman & Lavine and David W.
    Niesenbaum, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
    Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    We agree with the district court that the referee in bankruptcy had a reasonable
    basis for concluding that Emil Paul was not a knowing participant in the
    complained of financial statement and statement of affairs transactions in this
    bankruptcy.

    That part of the order of the district court affirming the order of the Referee,
    granting discharge to Emil Paul, which is the only part of said order from which
    appeal has been taken, will be affirmed.

    You might also like