Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    In Re: Michael A. Bornn Cesar Cortes Garcia Lee J. Rohn, 263 F.3d 61, 3rd Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for a writ of mandamus from three petitioners (Michael A. Bornn, Cesar Cortes Garcia, and Lee J. Rohn) relating to a case in the District Court of the Virgin Islands. In a brief order, the Third Circuit indicated it considered the record from the District Court and arguments made on May 18, 2001, but determined the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Costs were taxed against the petitioners.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    In Re: Michael A. Bornn Cesar Cortes Garcia Lee J. Rohn, 263 F.3d 61, 3rd Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    The Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for a writ of mandamus from three petitioners (Michael A. Bornn, Cesar Cortes Garcia, and Lee J. Rohn) relating to a case in the District Court of the Virgin Islands. In a brief order, the Third Circuit indicated it considered the record from the District Court and arguments made on May 18, 2001, but determined the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Costs were taxed against the petitioners.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-05-30 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 263 F.3d 61 Docket: 00-4202

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for a writ of mandamus from three petitioners (Michael A. Bornn, Cesar Cortes Garcia, and Lee J. Rohn) relating to a case in the District Court of the Virgin Islands. In a brief order, the Third Circuit indicated it considered the record from the District Court and arguments made on May 18, 2001, but determined the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Costs were taxed against the petitioners.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views1 page

    In Re: Michael A. Bornn Cesar Cortes Garcia Lee J. Rohn, 263 F.3d 61, 3rd Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for a writ of mandamus from three petitioners (Michael A. Bornn, Cesar Cortes Garcia, and Lee J. Rohn) relating to a case in the District Court of the Virgin Islands. In a brief order, the Third Circuit indicated it considered the record from the District Court and arguments made on May 18, 2001, but determined the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Costs were taxed against the petitioners.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    263 F.3d 61 (3rd Cir.

    2001)

    IN RE: MICHAEL A. BORNN;


    CESAR CORTES GARCIA; LEE J. ROHN, PETITIONERS
    No. 00-4202

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD


    CIRCUIT
    May 30, 2001
    1

    ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS ADDRESSED TO THE


    DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS (Division of St. Thomas and
    St. John) Thomas J. Moore, Judge; (Related to D.C. No. 00-MC-00001)

    Present: Becker, Chief Judge, McKee and Rendell, Circuit Judges

    ORDER
    3

    This petition for a writ of mandamus came on to be heard on the record from
    the District Court of the Virgin Islands and was argued by counsel May 18,
    2001.

    On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this Court


    that the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. Costs taxed against the
    petitioners. All of the above in accordance with the opinion of this Court
    announced from the bench on May 18, 2001. All of the above in accordance
    with the opinion of this Court.

    You might also like