Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    William S. and Mary P. Serri v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 354 F.2d 1002, 3rd Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit regarding a petition for review of a decision by the Tax Court of the United States. The case, William S. and Mary P. Serri v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, was argued on November 18, 1965 and decided on December 2, 1965, with a rehearing denied on February 18, 1966. In a per curiam opinion, the Third Circuit found no error in the record and affirmed the decision of the Tax Court for the reasons provided in Judge Hoyt's Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    William S. and Mary P. Serri v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 354 F.2d 1002, 3rd Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit regarding a petition for review of a decision by the Tax Court of the United States. The case, William S. and Mary P. Serri v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, was argued on November 18, 1965 and decided on December 2, 1965, with a rehearing denied on February 18, 1966. In a per curiam opinion, the Third Circuit found no error in the record and affirmed the decision of the Tax Court for the reasons provided in Judge Hoyt's Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1966-02-18 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 354 F.2d 1002 Docket: 15321

    Original Title

    William S. And Mary P. Serri v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 354 F.2d 1002, 3rd Cir. (1966)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit regarding a petition for review of a decision by the Tax Court of the United States. The case, William S. and Mary P. Serri v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, was argued on November 18, 1965 and decided on December 2, 1965, with a rehearing denied on February 18, 1966. In a per curiam opinion, the Third Circuit found no error in the record and affirmed the decision of the Tax Court for the reasons provided in Judge Hoyt's Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views1 page

    William S. and Mary P. Serri v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 354 F.2d 1002, 3rd Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit regarding a petition for review of a decision by the Tax Court of the United States. The case, William S. and Mary P. Serri v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, was argued on November 18, 1965 and decided on December 2, 1965, with a rehearing denied on February 18, 1966. In a per curiam opinion, the Third Circuit found no error in the record and affirmed the decision of the Tax Court for the reasons provided in Judge Hoyt's Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    354 F.

    2d 1002

    William S. and Mary P. SERRI, Petitioners,


    v.
    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
    No. 15321.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued November 18, 1965.
    Decided December 2, 1965.
    Rehearing Denied February 18, 1966.

    On Petition for Review of the Decision of the Tax Court of the United
    States.
    David Berger, Philadelphia, Pa., (Frank S. Deming, Philadelphia, Pa., on
    the brief), for petitioners.
    Burton Berkley, Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D. C.
    (John B. Jones, Jr., Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, John M.
    Brant, Jeanine Jacobs, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.
    C., on the brief), for respondent.
    Before KALODNER, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and SMITH,
    Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    On review of the record we find no error. The Decision of the Tax Court will
    be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in Judge Hoyt's Memorandum
    Findings of Fact and Opinion (T. C. Memo 1964-219).

    You might also like