Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business As A Partnership Under The Name and Style of Hook & Miller v. HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the district court in a case between C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller doing business as Hook & Miller versus Hook & Ackerman, Inc. The appeals court agreed with the reasons and opinion set out by the district court judge in his decision. The points presented on appeal were discussed in the lower court's opinion. The judgment of the district court was affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1953-02-06 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 201 F.2d 512 Docket: 10828

    Original Title

    C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., 201 F.2d 512, 3rd Cir. (1953)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the district court in a case between C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller doing business as Hook & Miller versus Hook & Ackerman, Inc. The appeals court agreed with the reasons and opinion set out by the district court judge in his decision. The points presented on appeal were discussed in the lower court's opinion. The judgment of the district court was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views1 page

    C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business As A Partnership Under The Name and Style of Hook & Miller v. HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the district court in a case between C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller doing business as Hook & Miller versus Hook & Ackerman, Inc. The appeals court agreed with the reasons and opinion set out by the district court judge in his decision. The points presented on appeal were discussed in the lower court's opinion. The judgment of the district court was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    201 F.

    2d 512

    C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a


    Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller
    v.
    HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant.
    No. 10828.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued January 22, 1953.
    Decided February 6, 1953.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Pennsylvania; William Alva Stewart, Judge.
    Harry Price, New York City (Stonecipher & Cunningham, by Charles L.
    Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Matthew Sidney Biron, Philadelphia, Pa., on
    the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
    William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W.
    Miller, ind. and d/b/a/ Hook & Miller; and R. O. Graffius.
    Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    Points presented in this appeal were all discussed in the opinion of Judge
    Stewart in the district court. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.,
    D.C.W.D.Pa.1952, 103 F. Supp. 790. We think that he was right and affirm for
    the reasons set out in his opinion.

    The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

    You might also like