Professional Documents
Culture Documents
23 Soc - Sec.rep - Ser. 576, Unempl - Ins.rep. CCH 14270a Ernest Frankenfield v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, 861 F.2d 405, 3rd Cir. (1988)
23 Soc - Sec.rep - Ser. 576, Unempl - Ins.rep. CCH 14270a Ernest Frankenfield v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, 861 F.2d 405, 3rd Cir. (1988)
23 Soc - Sec.rep - Ser. 576, Unempl - Ins.rep. CCH 14270a Ernest Frankenfield v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, 861 F.2d 405, 3rd Cir. (1988)
2d 405
of the Secretary and remand for the entry of an order directing a remand to the
Secretary for further consideration of Frankfield's medical and psychiatric
impairments between March 1985 and September 1987.
2
Frankenfield never worked after the March 25, 1985 myocardial infarction. He
continued to report to his physicians episodes of pain in his left arm and chest,
shortness of breath, and easy fatigability. In March 1986, a treadmill test was
discontinued after five minutes because of shortness of breath, left leg pain, and
fatigue.
Frankenfield applied for disability benefits on July 2, 1985. His claim was
denied and he requested a hearing, which was held on November 3, 1986. The
administrative law judge ruled that Frankenfield was not disabled, and the
Appeals Council denied Frankenfield's request for review. The administrative
record contains reports from Dr. Alan D. Bramowitz, Frankenfield's
cardiologist, Dr. Nirmala Somani, his internist, and Dr. Guillermo Borrero, a
psychiatrist who treated him for major depression. Dr. Bramowitz reported that
Frankenfield suffered in August 1986 from very limited exercise tolerance,
which rendered him incapable of returning to work. Dr. Somani reported as of
October 22, 1986, that Frankenfield's functional capacity was limited by
shortness of breath caused by minimal exertion. She recommended that he
completely avoid physical exertion and concluded that he was disabled from
pursuing any occupation. Both Dr. Bramowitz and Dr. Somani find a
psychological disorder as well as exertional impairments. Dr. Somani's report
disclosed that Frankenfield was taking 150 mg of Sinequan for sleep and
depression. Dr. Borrero's reports of May 20, 1987 and June 4, 1987 disclose a
diagnosis of depression which causes inability to function adequately, and Dr.
Borrero states that because of his current level of functioning, he should not
return to work.
5
The administrative law judge ruled that Frankenfield has residual functional
capacity to perform the physical exertion requirements of work except for
strenuous exertion above the light level and that there are no nonexertional
limitations. Conceding that Frankenfield could not perform his past relevant
work as a pipefitter, the administrative law judge concluded that since he could
perform the full range of light work, he was not disabled. Critical to this
conclusion were these findings:
6
[T]he
claimant's contentions with respect to totally disabling pain, shortness of
breath, and other physical limitations do not appear credible and are inconsistent
with the detailed clinical findings, the results of diagnostic thallium stress tests
subsequent to bypass surgery, his use of medication, his regular range of daily
activities, and his appearance and demeanor at the hearing.
7* * *
8* * *
9There are no nonexertional limitations.
10
11
12
13
14
At the Appeals Council level, Frankenfield submitted and the Appeals Council
received in evidence Dr. Borrero's March 1987 report. The Appeals Council
ruled that the report was insufficient to establish a nonexertional impairment
prior to February 27, 1987, the last date on which Frankenfield's current
application was effective. This conclusion ignores the contents of the reports of
Dr. Bramowitz and Dr. Somani, which disclose, long prior to February 27,
1987, an ongoing condition of depression. Dr. Borrero credited Frankenfield's
disclosure to him of depression and incapacity to function following open heart
surgery. His report clearly covers a period prior to the hearing. Thus, the
Appeals Council should have considered the new evidence in Dr. Borrero's
report.1 Szubak v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 745 F.2d 831 (3d
Cir.1984).
15
The summary judgment in favor of the Secretary will be reversed and the case
remanded for the entry of an order directing the Secretary to reconsider
Frankenfield's exertional and nonexertional impairments between March 1985
and September 1987.
Hon. Louis H. Pollak, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania sitting by designation