Assessment for Project 1 (8462)

Section A
Did not identify 5 research-based and peer-reviewed (with data) articles (related to your
assigned focus) for objective 1.
Did not identify 5 research-based and peer-reviewed (with data) articles (related to your
assigned focus) for objective 2.
Did not identify 1 article from professional journals (not magazines) for objective 3.

-1

Did not identify 1 article from professional journals (not magazines) for objective 4.

-1

Did not identify 1 article from professional journals (not magazines) for objective 5.

-1

Did not identify 1 article from professional journals (not magazines) for objective 6.

-1

One of the articles used for this project was not published before 2006.

-1

One of the articles used for this project, in alignment with objectives 1 and 2, was not
research-based.
One of the articles used for this project, in alignment with objectives 1 and 2, was not
published from peer-reviewed journals.
The research for one of the articles used for this project, in alignment with objectives 1 and
2, was not done in the United States.
The context of one of the articles used for this project, in alignment with objectives 3, 4, 5
and 6, was not from the United States.

-1

-1
-1

-1
-1
-1

Deductions for Section A

Section B
Did not submit a complete summary table containing information about author(s) for each
article used.
Did not submit a complete summary table containing information about year of publication
for each article used.
Did not submit a complete summary table containing information about article title for each
article used.
Did not submit a complete summary table containing information about journal title for each
article used.
Did not submit a complete summary table containing information about journal volume and
issue number for each article used.
Did not submit a complete summary table containing information about page numbers for
each article used.
Did not submit a word file containing the summary table with accurate submission protocol.

Deductions for Section B

-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1

Section C
Did not have an accurate APA citation for an article used for this assignment (repeated for
each entry).
Did not follow at least one writing protocol for an article used for this assignment (repeated
for each entry).
Did not include a narrative pertaining to the purpose of an article used for this assignment
(repeated for each entry).
Did not include a narrative pertaining to recommendations of an article used for this
assignment (repeated for each entry).
Did not include a narrative pertaining to the value of the article's content in supporting a
professional development proposal on teaching, learning and technology for one of the
articles used for this assignment (repeated for each entry).
Did not submit a word file containing the annotation with accurate submission protocol.

-1 to
-14
-1 to
-14
-1 to
-14
-1 to
-14
-1 to
-14
-1

Deductions for Section C

Section D
Did not include a digital copy of the article used for this assignment (repeated for each entry)
Did not follow accurate submission protocols for the digital file of the article used for this
assignment (repeated for each entry)

-1 to
-14
-1 to
-14

Deductions for Section D

Overall Quality of Submission
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT - Incomplete sections. Reads like it was done in a hurry. Needs to
include relevant content. Needs more attention to details.
Developing - Writing mechanics can be improved as well as alignment of ideas across the
board. Feels like a first draft. Need more attention to details.
ACCEPTABLE - Revisions are needed for more appropriate content in several areas as well
as improvement in the flow of the narratives. Need more attention to details.
GOOD - Content is good but needs stronger transitions and less formatting issues. Need
more attention to details.
WELL-DONE - Quality of writing is well-done coupled with well-placed transitions from one
idea to the next. Attention to details is evident.
Overall Quality of Submission

-4
-3
-2
-1
0