Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SQ 777 Foes Change Tactics After Challenge Dismissed: Claremore Daily Progress
SQ 777 Foes Change Tactics After Challenge Dismissed: Claremore Daily Progress
11
A008
Clip
resized
49%
The Oklahoma Supreme Court ... basically stated it will not inject itself into the legislative process by deciding the validity of
legislation before it is enacted, DeasonToyne said. This ... is not a decision on the
merits of our claims it just is basically stating that our challenge shouldnt be heard
unless and until SQ 777 becomes law.
STIRs challenge, which was joined by a
state lawmaker, a family farmer and a property owner who co-founded the Tahlequahbased coalition,
laid out four arguments upon
which they believe SQ 777 is unconstitutional. They said the legislative referendum would
unconstitutionally bind, or hamstring, future
Legislatures, addresses more than one subject,
violates separation of powers, and is unconstitutionally vague.
Supreme Court justices made it clear the
issues raised in STIRs challenge remain
unadjudicated and intact. The opinion left the
door open for additional challenges that might
be brought under the federal or state constitutions by a proper party if voters approve
the controversial measure.
SQ 777 proponents, which include corporate agricultural interests, contend the constitutional protections sought are needed to protect the interests of farmers and ranchers
believed to be under attack by animal rights
and environmental activists. They also have
put forth an argument that passage would
ensure an affordable food supply.
Opponents argue the measure would allow
corporate interests to engage unimpeded in
Property of OPS News Tracker and members of the Oklahoma Press Association.
rate agricultural interests, contend the constitutional protections sought are needed to protect the interests of farmers and ranchers
believed to be under attack by animal rights
and environmental activists.
They also have put forth an argument that
passage would ensure an affordable food supply.
Opponents argue the measure would allow
corporate interests to engage unimpeded in
activities and employ technology that would
harm the environment and consumers.
Requiring lawmakers to prove future laws
dealing with agricultural activities are narrowly tailored to further a compelling state interest, critics say would make it nearly impossible to regulate the agricultural industry and its
practices.
Deason-Toyne pointed out the ironies of
the courts decision to allow SQ 777 to remain
on the general election ballot. While the ruling
gives voters a voice in the decision to approve
or reject the measure, she said its passage ultimately would rob them of that voice.
If SQ 777 becomes law, people will lose
that voice when it comes to regulating farming
(and) ranching agricultural practices,
Deason-Toyne said. It will be entirely up to
the courts to decide whether there is a compelling state interest which would justify state
regulations we will lose our voice.
SQ 777 is scheduled to be presented Nov.
8 to voters along with several other ballot
measures and candidates competing for federal, state and local offices.
Aug
11
Oklahoma Cattlemen
Supports State Question 777
2016
Page
A008
Clip
resized
74%
urst
esteek.
ers
l
folmail,
mber,
end.
d via
telewill
via
t be
mber
ions
rson
li
Property of OPS News Tracker and members of the Oklahoma Press Association.
Clip
resized
49%
The Ardmoreite
ons2@yahoo.com.
Property of OPS News Tracker and members of the Oklahoma Press Association.