Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jones v. Pettiford, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    Evans Lee Jones, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his post-judgment motion for an order to show cause. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Jones' motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-07-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6747

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Evans Lee Jones, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his post-judgment motion for an order to show cause. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Jones' motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Jones v. Pettiford, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Evans Lee Jones, a federal prisoner, appealed the district court's denial of his post-judgment motion for an order to show cause. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Jones' motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6747

    EVANS LEE JONES,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    M. PETTIFORD, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (3:06-cv-02597-CMC)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 2008

    Decided:

    July 28, 2008

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Evans Lee Jones, Appellant Pro Se.


    Barbara Murcier Bowens,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Evans Lee Jones, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order denying his post-judgment motion for order to show
    cause.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court. See Jones v. Pettiford, No. 3:06-cv-02597-CMC (D.S.C. filed
    Apr. 30, 2008; entered May 1, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like