Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Korell Battle v. Darryl King, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case where Korell Battle appealed a district court's denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Darryl King, Jan Pittman, and SCDC. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-12-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-7579

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case where Korell Battle appealed a district court's denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Darryl King, Jan Pittman, and SCDC. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Korell Battle v. Darryl King, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case where Korell Battle appealed a district court's denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Darryl King, Jan Pittman, and SCDC. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-7579

    KORELL BATTLE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DARRYL KING; JAN PITTMAN; SCDC,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
    District Judge. (2:12-cv-02476-CMC)

    Submitted:

    December 19, 2013

    Decided:

    December 24, 2013

    Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Korell Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Nikole D. Haltiwanger, Roy F.


    Laney,
    Thomas
    Lowndes Pope,
    Jayme
    Leigh
    Shy,
    Damon
    C.
    Wlodarczyk, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Korell

    Battle

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    v.

    King,

    dispense

    No.

    2:12-cv-02476-CMC

    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    (D.S.C.
    because

    presented

    in

    Sept.
    the
    the

    16,
    facts

    have

    Battle

    2013).

    We

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like