Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Chapman v. Huffman, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Louis Ray Chapman Jr. filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit stated it had reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its December 14, 2006 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-06-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6053

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Louis Ray Chapman Jr. filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit stated it had reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its December 14, 2006 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Chapman v. Huffman, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Louis Ray Chapman Jr. filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit stated it had reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its December 14, 2006 order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6053

    LOUIS RAY CHAPMAN, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, Western
    Regional Office; DANIEL A. BRAXTON, Warden,
    Augusta Correctional Center; CAPTAIN SMILEY,
    Shift Commander; SERGEANT PRITT, Building
    Sergeant (Supervisor); C/O TYLER; C/O WHITT;
    C/O BURCH; DONALD A. VORGERT, Food Service
    Director-A;
    TOM
    SANDERS,
    Food
    Service
    Director-B,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (7:06-cv-00708-jlk)

    Submitted:

    May 30, 2007

    Decided:

    June 28, 2007

    Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Louis Ray Chapman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Louis Ray Chapman, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
    U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    Chapman v. Huffman, No. 7:06-cv-00708-jlk

    (W.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like