Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Faison v. Deal, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Moses Faison filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Deal and Superintendent Whitener which was denied by the district court. 2) Faison appealed the district court's denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, so they affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Faison.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Faison v. Deal, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    1) Moses Faison filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Deal and Superintendent Whitener which was denied by the district court. 2) Faison appealed the district court's denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, so they affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Faison.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7823

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Moses Faison filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Deal and Superintendent Whitener which was denied by the district court. 2) Faison appealed the district court's denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, so they affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Faison.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Faison v. Deal, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Moses Faison filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Officer Deal and Superintendent Whitener which was denied by the district court. 2) Faison appealed the district court's denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, so they affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Faison.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7823

    MOSES FAISON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    OFFICER DEAL,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    SUPERINTENDENT WHITENER,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00050)

    Submitted:

    June 15, 2007

    Decided:

    June 25, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Moses Faison, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Moses Faison appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.


    5:06-cv-00050 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2006).

    We have reviewed

    Faison v. Deal, No.

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like